The problem with the system

There was a piece in the Lansing State Journal last week that talked about the dirty, dirty business of college basketball recruiting. It was very similar to other articles that we’ve seen about the dirty, dirty business of college basketball recruiting, this time using the Central Florida NCAA case as a jumping-off point.

This particular story focuses on the AAU coach-as-talent-pipeline angle, and the NCAA jumps in with their Superman suit on, vowing to compel “some” summer league programs to turn over their elusive donor lists. And of course, ol’ Roy, who’s never broken any rules, chimes in and cheers on the NCAA, and focuses all his wrath on those mean old agents who take all the fun out of coaching.

But taking the cake is Michigan State coach Tom Izzo, who complains bitterly about how he’s lost players because he refuses to cheat, and how the majority of top-level player recruitment is based on cheating.

Coach Izzo, you’re obviously a very respectable man, but honestly? You need to either put up or shut up on this topic. And that goes for every coach that “speaks out” against rampant cheating, yet only provides weak anonymous drivel — stuff that doubtless makes Dana O’Neil salivate, but does utterly nothing to fix the actual problems of college basketball.

Yes, of course, Central Florida was full of bad boys that deserved punishment, from the athletic director on down. It was also convenient, of course, that Central Florida is a worthless also-ran of a basketball program that no one cares about, even the people who go to school there. There are no worries in dropping a dime on the UCF program, because they’re operating above their station, pulling recruits from people they shouldn’t be (if you believe in the “order of things” in college basketball, of course).

But the amount of empty bellyaching from coaches in this article is vomit-inducing, particularly if you’re a knowledgeable college basketball fan — you know, the kind who’s read Raw Recruits and Sole Influence and keeps at least occasional tabs on the sausage factory that is the Rivals Top 150 every year.

Roy Williams just wouldn’t cheat, you know? So he didn’t recruit DeShawn Stephenson. Gary Williams wouldn’t play the game with Rudy Gay, so Jim Calhoun and UConn got him. Bob Huggins was “hesitant” to recruit OJ Mayo because of the “circus” that surrounded him…HAHAHAHAHAHAHA…..sorry, lost it for a second there, now I’m good.

But Izzo comes off sounding worst of all in this. He actually says the following in this story:

“If there’s a reason why (Gary Williams) is not coaching – thoughts are that he got married, he was getting older — I would guarantee you that No. 1 on the list, you know more than I do but I’ve talked to him enough, is that he is just sick of the crap, which is sad,” Izzo said. “What’s hard is that sometimes the elites of the elites don’t have to deal with it. It’s the middle rung, the Marylands, the Michigan States, the Texases, that are in that middle. That is a problem.

“It’s just sad,” Izzo said. “I don’t see any way of stopping it, unless everything is curtailed and AAU basketball goes under USA Basketball. It just seems like they can’t take on that animal. So everyone makes money off basketball.”

You don’t see any way of stopping it? Really, coach? With all due respect, that’s about as big of a cop-out statement as I can think of.

Izzo is one of the most respected coaches in the business, and you could make an argument that he should be the most respected. If Izzo feels that this sport he cares so much about is being irreparably damaged by this process, then change needs to come from within the coaching fraternity. If Izzo and his fellow respected coaches aren’t willing to stand up and point out the hypocrisy and the cheating being carried out by people in the coaching profession, then nothing is going to change.

We’ve seen this song and dance before. Go back and read Raw Recruits and you’ll see the same complaining from coaches — how they feel powerless to do anything about the rampant cheating, yet it only increases year after year. That book talks a great deal about this “code of silence” that pervades the college coahcing industry, and treats it as if it’s some sort of noble act for these coaches to look the other way while their fellow coaches break the rules they’ve all agreed to be governed by.

Twenty years later, nothing has changed. And I’m out of patience with coaches complaining about the situation. If Izzo, Roy Williams, Tom Crean, and any of the other coaches out there want to be taken seriously on this topic, they have to actually do something to police their own profession. We’ve long since proven that nobody else is going to police the coaching profession — not the NCAA, not the athletic directors, and certainly not college presidents.

You think AAU is a problem? Yes, it is, but that’s because there’s a market for that behavior. The coaching community pulls the strings on this, in concert with athletic directors and shoe companies. AAU coaches and connected agents are providing a service that is being paid for by the coaches and their connected areas. This idea that college coaches are innocent bystanders in this scary world of AAU is both silly and insulting to those who actually pay attention.

As a longtime watcher of college basketball, I’d love nothing more than to see the entire mechanism of recruiting come visible. Part of the issue here is the NCAA, which is living in a fairyland, but that’s for a different blog post. But right now, the larger issue is the refusal of college coaches to take charge of their own profession. If they don’t want to, then fine — but then please stop complaining about losing players because of your noble refusal to cheat. By doing nothing about this situation, you’re cheating every fan and player who does care about the game of college basketball.

 

Posted in News and Notes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The problem with the system

Is College Basketball doomed to irrelevance?

I was listening earlier this week to the latest Bill Simmons – Chuck Klosterman podcast(s), where the hosts tackled a variety of topics. One of those topics caught my ear, however, and it had to do with the nature of celebrity and the current state of the sport of basketball, which starts at about the 8 minute mark of Part 2 of the 7/18 podcast.

Anyone who’s listened to (or read) Simmons regularly knows he’s only interested in college basketball in relation to what kind of talent is bubbling through the pipes to feed his precious NBA. Meanwhile, Klosterman is very much a college sports fan, both basketball and football.

What made this discussion worth listening to was Klosterman saying that the NBA game has exceeded the college game in terms of the number of people who care about it, something that he didn’t think was possible when he first started watching basketball in the late 1970s. His summation of the reason why was quite interesting:

In every tier of society, entertainment, sports, politics, everything. There’s a greater emphasis on celebrity. And you can’t be a collegiate celebrity the way you can be a professional celebrity. You know, you can’t be a collegiate star the way you can be an NBA star, because an NBA star can mean things that have nothing to do with basketball. And that’s what drives everything now. Everything is driven by people’s sense of relationship with what they are watching. “Do I feel like I know this person? Do I know what this person is like outside of what I am watching?”.

This notion of “celebrity” in society is a near-constant these days, and much of it has to do with the interconnected nature of our culture. Whereas before, due to the distances between information sources and the time it took for news to travel, it was truly difficulty and unique for a person or group to achieve nationwide celebrity status. Now, culture is constantly focusing on celebrities, and the ability to follow multiple individuals in the pop culture sphere is there for anyone with a Twitter account. Continue reading

Posted in News and Notes | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

NBA Draft – Top Five Winners

I’ve never been one for speculation. Spending hours wondering who will go where in drafts is only interesting to me if I personally know someone who is trying to get drafted. Draft night itself, however, is one of my favorite nights in sports. And I will defiantly spend hours of my time afterwards analyzing each team’s picks once they’ve been made.

Here are the teams that I feel did the best in this year’s NBA draft:

 

1. New Orleans Hornets — duh.

The Hornets could have taken Anthony Davis, then selected my two uncles, and still would have had the best draft of 2012.

Davis is the kind of player that only comes around once or twice a decade. If you are reading this column, I am assuming that you already know how incredibly talented Davis is at the game of basketball. He’s got the agility of a 6’3” guard in a 6’11” body. And unlike most centers in the NBA, he tries 100% of the time, listens to coaches, and doesn’t throw a fit when things don’t go his way. He’s a defensive nightmare and he’s still getting noticeably better.

But the Hornets won huge with Davis for another reason too: he’s the most marketable first round draft pick since LeBron.

Sports marketing professionals will tell us that big men don’t sell. Kids on playgrounds imagine themselves being Kobe Bryant or Derrick Rose, breaking ankles with their crossover and making that game-winning three. Kids don’t imagine themselves being 6’10” and grabbing rebounds. It just isn’t relatable.

But Davis has something better than relate-ability. He’s got character.

That eyebrow is going to be worth more money than Heidi Klum’s legs. The t-shirts, the jerseys, the endorsements, the fake brows – the ensemble is going to sell out merchandise faster than most teams can sell tickets. The Hornets will be raking in cash from this kid and his unibrow all around.

New Orleans had other picks as well, and they used them on shooting guard (whoops, I mean point guard) Austin Rivers at number 10, and Kentucky sixth man Darius Miller at 46.

Although I’m not a Rivers hater like some that are out there – I actually like his confidence on the court, and I think that he will be a better pro than college player if he continues to be coachable – this pick puzzles me a little.

If the Hornets are serious about keeping Eric Gordon, why draft a player who basically plays the same position? Gordon and Davis both need the ball in their hands, and Rivers is not the guy to get it to them. Continue reading

Posted in News and Notes | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on NBA Draft – Top Five Winners

Changing the Rules, Part II

Last week, Samantha gave us her ideas for some rules changes to help make the game of college basketball better. She continues her suggestions in this newest entry.

Here are a few suggestions to make the game better, Part II:

 

Media Availability of the Losing Team

A couple weeks ago, LeBron James finally got his hardware. The nation watched as LeBron and Dwayne Wade hugged, and Chris Bosh fully emerged himself in champagne.

But amid these images of celebration, the nation also watched a very private and personal moment between Kevin Durant and his family.

Many people across America applauded CBS for capturing such a poignant moment. It apparently made viewers feel better to watch someone break down and cry. People said it was “beautiful” and “touching.” But it just made me uncomfortable.

Durant is a 23-year-old kid, who worked his assoff to reach a goal he’s dreamed about since he was young – and the cameras were there to capture his reaction to having failed at it. Anyone who loses a National Championship/World Title/Gold Medal should be entitled to immediately vacate the premises, find their mother, and cry.

Alone.

As in “without cameras in his face and millions of people watching at home.”

Imagine you just got fired. How would you feel in that moment? Would you think of all the people you let down? Feel ashamed for not being able to do better? Now imagine that instantly after you’re told, someone sticks a camera in your face and asks you how you’re feeling. And everyone in the world is watching your reaction.

If there were ever a rule that I really care about changing, it is this one: the players/coaches of the losing team of a title game are not required to speak to the media until 24 hours after the game has ended, and cameras are not allowed to shoot them once they have stepped off the court.

The majority of media members, and millions of the viewing public, feel as though it is their right to be able to look in on these moments.

It isn’t. Continue reading

Posted in News and Notes | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Changing the Rules, Part II

Bobby Hurley…a Coaching Legend

Twenty six state championships; multiple national championships; over 1,000 career
victories; one of three high school coaches in the Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame. All
of these incredible accomplishments pale in comparison to the numerous lives (Jersey City, N.J.) St. Anthony’s head basketball coach, Bobby Hurley, has changed.

Disregard the fact that the sports world is marred by scandal and misdeed. It is
inevitable that young children, especially athletes, will look to sports to find their role
models. The pool of eligible role models within sports seems to be shrinking as each day
goes by. I was lucky enough to sit down and talk to Coach Hurley, a role model on and
off the court. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Bobby Hurley…a Coaching Legend

Changing the Rules: Three ideas

“It’s not enough to say, ‘it’s all part of the game.'” – NBA Commissioner David Stern

 

By now I think we can all agree that basketball is the greatest sport ever invented, but I think we can all also agree that there are a few changes that can be made to the rule book to make it even better.

As Stern put it a few weeks ago, “The game continually changes, coaching changes, the athletes change, and what our job is, without going overboard, to consider those adjustments and just keep up with the game.”

Here are a few suggestions to make the game better:

 

Eliminate the Block/Charge

This year college basketball marked a restricted area around the hoop for the first time. As a result, referees would often pay more attention to the mark on the floor instead of the basketball play itself. It seemed that if a defender was outside the hoop they would get the charge call, regardless of all the other criteria.

Everyone involved in and around basketball will admit that a block or a charge is basically a 50/50 call. So then why do we have it at all?

If all a defender is doing is having his hands up and moving laterally, he shouldn’t be called for a foul. A player standing with his hands above his head is not fouling anyone, even if the opposing player jumps into him. Not every instance of players coming into contact needs to be a whistle.

It is my belief that we should try to make the college/professional game of basketball as much like a pickup game as possible. And let’s face it, when was the last time you’ve seen anyone try to take a charge during a pickup game? They’d be laughed at. Teammates would tell them to play “real defense.”

And by real defense they mean make a play on the ball. Continue reading

Posted in News and Notes | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment