Under The Radar Game of the Day: Tuesday, February 11th

For last night’s Hoops HD Report podcast – CLICK HERE

For Jon Teitel’s interview with Hall of Fame coach Billie Moore – CLICK HERE

Bowling Green (18-6, 9-2) at Akron (17-6, 7-3) – 7:00 PM EST (ESPN+)

Tonight’s UTR Game of the Day features a game of the top two teams in the MAC as the Bowling Green Falcons travel across Route 224 for a meeting with the Akron Zips. Bowling Green is coming off of a victory against Toledo where Justin Turner scored 31 points (including a perfect 11-of-11 from the foul line) against the Rockets on Saturday. For his efforts, Turner was named MAC Player of the Week for the third time this season.

Akron suddenly hit the skids about a week ago thanks to losses at home against Buffalo and on the road against Kent State in the Wagon Wheel rivalry by a combined total of four points. They also looked like they were in serious danger of taking on a third straight loss at home against Eastern Michigan on Saturday, but Xeyrius Williams came to the rescue with a game-winning 3-point shot with under five seconds remaining to give Akron a 59-58 win.

Posted in CBB on TV, Daily Rundown, Under the Radar | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Under The Radar Game of the Day: Tuesday, February 11th

The Hoops HD Report: February 10th

Tonight we look at the Selection Committee’s release of the top 16 team and discuss what we agreed and disagreed with, particularly Michigan State making the top 16 and Penn State not making it.  We also look at the ACC and discuss the big game between Duke and Florida State, Louisville’s continued dominance, Virginia’s continued improvement, and how Notre Dame has started to sneak into the bubble picture.  In the Pac 12, Oregon, Arizona, and Stanford had rough weeks and we take a look at that.  Gonzaga, Dayton, and San Diego State continue to dominate their leagues.  All that, and more…

And for all you radio lovers, below is an audio only version of the show…

Posted in Hoops HD Report, Podcasts, Videocasts | Comments Off on The Hoops HD Report: February 10th

Happy Tourney-versary!: HoopsHD interviews Hall of Fame coach Billie Moore

With the 2020 NCAA tourney tipping off next month, we will spend this month taking a walk down memory lane with a choice collection of players/coaches who are celebrating an awesome anniversary this year. From some game-winning FTs in the 1955 tourney (65th anniversary) through a 17-PT comeback win in the 2015 1st 4 (5th anniversary), these legends have all carved out a little piece of history in past Marches. We continue our series with Hall of Famer Billie Moore, the 1st coach in women’s basketball history to lead 2 different schools to national championships. She won the 1970 CIAW national title in in her 1st year at Cal State-Fullerton and won the 1978 AIAW national title in her 1st year as coach at UCLA. She made the Final Four 5 times during the 1970s and was the head coach of the original team USA women at the 1976 Olympics. She was inducted into both the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame and the Women’s Basketball Hall of Fame in 1999. HoopsHD’s Jon Teitel got to chat with Coach Moore about the 50th anniversary of winning the 1970 title and the 45th anniversary of making the 1975 Final 4.

Your father coached boys and girls basketball in Kansas: how much of an influence was he on your own decision to become a coach? He was the 1 who got me into sports and I loved competing. When I went to college there was not even an opportunity to become a coach so I went back and got my Masters degree. Coach Charlotte West also helped me: if not for her then I would have never made it to the university level.

You were known for being a strict disciplinarian who held physically demanding practices: what made them so effective, and how did your players like practice? We had a culture of discipline/execution. I always had the philosophy that if you worked hard to develop your skills during practice then it would be fun when you actually played the game. I might change the way that I communicated if I was still a coach but I would not change my style.

In the 1970 CIAW title game in your very 1st year as coach at Cal State Fullerton you had a 4-PT win over West Chester: what did it mean to you to win a title? It was just so new: they were making the switch to 5-on-5 so being around my dad coaching the boys made it easier for me. I focused so much more on the process every day in practice and assumed that the games would take care of themselves. Very rarely do you get to say that you were the best but those young ladies got to say it at that moment. There is always a special bond when you have that kind of success.

In the 1975 Final 4 you had a 9-PT loss to Immaculata: what was it like to face the 3-time defending champs and what made them such a great program? When you get to a certain level it comes down to who can consistently do things. A possession in the 1st minute of the game might not seem that important at the time but you have to raise the bar. To be a part of a game like that is the opportunity you strive for in practice every day.

In 8 years at Fullerton you lost a total of 15 games: how were you able to remain so dominant over such a long period of time? We had the right players who bought into the system. Xs and Os are easy if you have the right Xs to put in there! Talent alone does not win: you need to give some structure/guidance. No matter how technically sound you are you will not have success without at least some level of talent. I think that some of my main strengths was teaching the game and motivating my players. 1 of the things I learned from Coach John Wooden is that technical knowledge does not separate you out in the hierarchy of coaching.

Take me through the 1976 Olympics as the 1st-ever women’s head coach of team USA:
1 of your co-captains was Pat Summitt, who later said, “Billie Moore has had more influence on my coaching career than anyone”: what was she like as a player, and could you have imagined at the time that she would become 1 of the greatest coaches ever? There are 2 factors here. 1 of the things that we accomplished was qualifying by competing with 20+ other countries to claim 1 of the 2 spots. The hierarchy of USA Basketball did not expect us to reach the Olympics so we definitely overachieved, and that starts with a captain like Pat. I recommended Pat to become a coach for the junior team because she had a gift. Everyone has the will to win but what separated her out was her preparation: there was nothing she would not do to give her team a chance to be successful. She had similar intensity as a player and was a great leader.

You ended up winning a silver medal: what was the feeling like in your locker room afterward, and how unstoppable was 7’2′ Soviet center Juliana Semenova? She was a foot taller than all of our players. I told them that what they achieved was beyond what anyone had ever imagined. I told them to take great pride in being the 1st US Olympic women’s basketball team. I remember that Bill Russell was 1 of the announcers for the game: he said the only thing I did wrong was not sending in our 10th or 11th best player to try and take Semenova out of the game! 40 years later there is even a stronger sense of what we accomplished, as the current team USA is expected to win the gold medal every 4 years. They never backed away.

In the 1978 AIAW title game in very 1st year as head coach at UCLA, 4-time All-American Ann Meyers had 20 PTS/10 REB/9 AST/8 STL in a win over Maryland: how much of a home-court advantage did you have while playing at Pauley Pavilion in front of more than 9000 fans (which at the time was the largest crowd ever to see a women’s championship game) and where does Ann’s performance rank among the greatest that you have ever seen? It is a double-edged sword: it is wonderful to play on your home floor but it also gives you a lot of pressure to win it all. Once we reached the final I felt good about our chances because we had a very easy team to coach. Ann is 1 of the best all-around players that I have ever seen and was willing to do whatever it took to win. You do not appreciate what those players bring to the team until they are gone: she made everyone around her better, which is the best compliment you can give a player. I coached them as just players, not female players: it worked well for me because most of them had learned the game from their brothers. There were not a lot of AAU leagues or organized games for women back then. If you watch a high-level women’s game now the only thing they cannot do is dunk consistently.

You are the only coach in women’s basketball history to win titles at 2 different schools: what made you leave Fullerton, and do you think that we will ever see someone else do this? I think someone else will do it in the future. With the advent of Title IX I figured it was just a matter of time until the big-time conferences would start dominating women’s basketball. It took a while for Title IX to have an impact. Before that it was small schools like Immaculate/Delta State but now it is only power-conference teams.

After retiring from coaching in 1993 you became a consultant/instructor for a variety of teams/camps: how have you enjoyed retirement, and what do you hope to do in the future? I spent about 27 years around the Tennessee program and went to all of their NCAA tourney appearances, and then helped Pat’s son Tyler when he became a coach. Only recently have I really been a spectator, and that is okay.

In 1999 you were inducted into a pair of Halls of Fame: where did that rank among the highlights of your career? To be a part of the Women’s Hall of Fame charter class was nice: it is always great to be the 1st to do something. It ranks way up there with winning a championship and being in the Olympics. I feel very blessed but the reason I got there was my players/assistants: I never scored a point or made an assist.

Posted in Interviews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Happy Tourney-versary!: HoopsHD interviews Hall of Fame coach Billie Moore

Bracket Projection (Staff Bracket) – Monday, February 10th

-For Today’s UTR Game of the Day, and other News, Notes, and Games – CLICK HERE

There are only four weeks remaining in the regular season for most of the major conferences and only three weeks remaining in the regular season for most of the under-the-radar conferences, so we are beginning to get into crunch time with our bracket projections. This week, it is our colleague John Stalica’s turn to do the bracket projection – this is his bracket and NOT a projection of the Selection Committee:

First 4 Out: Minnesota, Memphis, NC State, Cincinnati

Other teams considered: Texas, Syracuse, Utah State, VCU, Tennessee, Pittsburgh, Georgetown, Virginia Tech, Alabama, Furman, UNC-Greensboro

NOTES FROM JOHN:

– While the real NCAA Selection Committee valued teams like Dayton, West Virginia, Villanova and Michigan State quite highly, I’m not completely sold that they should have been seeded as high as they were. I think teams like Florida State and Penn State were undersold, especially the Nittany Lions. I agree that their nonconference SOS is much higher than what you would expect of a protected seed, but my feeling is that it is 1)badly skewed by 4 teams in the bottom 30 of the NET and 2) offset by a dearth of quality wins like Maryland and Michigan State on the road along with a respectable 6-4 record away from Happy Valley.

– Auburn is looking more and more like a team that had one bad week and their quality wins are starting to look more indicative of very high metrics that the Tigers currently possess. With wins against Kentucky and LSU now in hand, Auburn is looking like the favorite to win the SEC right now.

– Purdue and Xavier are a pair of teams that I’m warming up to in the last two weeks, especially the Boilers. Their overall record is ghastly (not unlike Wisconsin), but they are getting more quality wins AND blowout wins in the cases of Michigan State and Iowa. They also got a quality win at Indiana.

– And speaking of the Hoosiers, it is deja vu all over again in Bloomington. It was about this time last season that they went into a deep midseason slump. I still think they’re an NCAA Tournament caliber team, but they would no longer fit the criteria of a “first ballot” team right now. They are only 3-5 away from home with their lone true road win coming at Nebraska. Rutgers will start to have the same question marks if they are unable to win at Ohio State or any of their remaining 3 road games after that.

– I had BYU as my last #9 seed and Mississippi State as my first #10 seed on my overall seed list, but bracketing rules pushed BYU down a seed line for this bracket.

– Arizona State is the only First Four team I felt comfortable placing in the field, and the profiles of teams like Wichita State, Florida, Stanford, Minnesota, NC State, Memphis and Cincinnati smell real bad right now. In the case of the three teams from the American, there might not be enough air freshener to get another at-large team besides Houston in without someone stealing a bid in the conference tournament.

– Prior to Saturday, I would have had Bowling Green as my MAC representative and a likely #14 seed, but with the loss of Dylan Frye (who left the team for personal reasons) and two upcoming games against Akron without him, I’m putting the Zips in as my MAC auto-bid for now.

COMMENTS FROM THE HOOPS HD STAFF

FROM DAVID.

-I totally agree with John and disagree with the committee on Michigan State.  The actual committee giving them a protected seed didn’t make much sense, and seeding them ahead of Penn State made no sense at all.  When you look at the merit, Penn State seems better in every category accept OOC SOS, which is an important category in the sense that you need to play good teams so you can beat good teams and impress the committee, but should also not be a disqualifier when you’ve beaten better teams than someone else despite playing a weaker overall schedule.

-I’m starting to like Maryland more now that they’ve won at Indiana and at Illinois.  My biggest gripe with them was that I thought too many people were seeing that they had beaten good teams, but not seeing that in some of those cases the good teams they had beaten, while good overall, hadn’t played well on the road, and were overvaluing some of their home wins.  But, the win at Illinois was very legit, and two of their four road losses were close games at Wisconsin and at Seton Hall, who are both obviously very tough teams to beat on the road.

-Stalica’s bubble perplexes me.  I do not get why he selected Arizona State, much less why he says they were the only team he was comfortable putting in the First Four.  And while he didn’t put Minnesota, NC State, or Memphis in, he did almost put them in for some strange reason.  I think that Cincinnati, Syracuse, Utah State, East Tennessee State (who he has in, but below Arizona State), all have better paper resumes.  Not only that, I think they would all beat Arizona State (and Memphis, and NC State, and Minnesota) on a neutral floor if given the chance.

-And he has Florida in the First Four??  Oh, wait.  I actually agree with that one.  A case could be made that Florida doesn’t belong in at all.

 

FROM CHAD:

– Let me start with Penn State as well, as I agree with John and David that the Bracket Preview this past weekend undervalued them.  One thing that a lot of people are forgetting is that the Big Ten expanded to a 20 game conference schedule this season.  That means 2 less non-conference games replaced by two more games against one of the deepest conferences we have ever seen.  If you want to knock the Nittany Lions for a 95 overall SOS, I can understand that, but don’t knock them for the N/C SOS when it is going to end up being less than 1/3 of their total schedule (and really it is just four sub-300 games that are really pulling that number down).

– I would have Houston at least 2 seed lines higher.  I know the rest of the American is fading, but the Cougars are poised to run away with what is still one of the top 7 or 8 conferences in the country, and are just looking incredibly good on the court right now.  To tell a 1 seed you may have to play this team in the second round could be a crime.  I would have them on the 6 line myself, and could make a case for the 5 if I had to.

– I am not certain Mississippi State belongs in, and if they do, they should be in Dayton playing in he First Four.  A 9 seed is way too high for a team that has not beaten anyone that is clearly in the field (Arkansas and at Florida are bubble team wins), and has two losses to sub-100 teams (and another non-tournament team loss at Alabama).

– There are two A-10 teams that John left out which I believe, right now, should be right in contention — VCU and Richmond.  The Spiders have a very interesting resume as Rhode Island’s rise in the standings gives them two wins away from home against tourney teams (they also beat Wisconsin on a neutral court).

– Finally, while NC State did not make John’s field, I cannot figure out why they are even close (first four out).  Honestly, if I had to pick another ACC team, I would take Syracuse first (whom John at least considered) and Notre Dame next.  The Irish have quietly won 4 straight and, with trips to both Virginia and Duke in store this week, will certainly have a chance to put their name right in the thick of tournament talk.

Posted in Bracketology, CBB, Commentary | Comments Off on Bracket Projection (Staff Bracket) – Monday, February 10th

Under The Radar Game of the Day: Monday, February 10th (and Other News, Notes, and Games)

For Jon Teitel’s latest weekly Bracket projection – CLICK HERE

Colgate (19-6, 10-2) at Boston University (15-10, 9-3) – 7:00 PM EST (CBS Sports Network)

Tonight’s UTR Game of the Day is one of two games involving the top two teams in their respective conferences (the other being Radford/Winthrop) – the Raiders of Colgate pay a visit to The Roof to take on the hometown Boston University Terriers. BU comes in to tonight’s game on a five-game winning streak; their last win was a 77-68 victory in the Turnpike Trophy game against Holy Cross. Javante McCoy had 20 points for BU in their last game.

Colgate comes into tonight’s game with only two losses in league play, yet both came courtesy of the Lafayette Leopards. Since their last loss to Lafayette, Colgate is on a three-game winning streak that includes victories against both Holy Cross and Lehigh on the road and Navy at home. Nelly Cummings (18 points) and four other Colgate figures scored in double figures in their most recent victory against Navy.

 

OTHER NEWS, NOTES, AND GAMES

-Marquette absolutely blew out Butler at home yesterday, which shows that they are continuing to get better and will likely be a dangerous team in March.  It also makes you question whether or not Butler will end up as a protected seed once the season is over.

-Houston blew away Wichita State yesterday.  This game indicates that when Houston plays up to their ceiling that they are really tough to beat.  It was the third straight loss for the Shockers, and one is starting to question whether or not they’ll even be inside the bubble come Selection Sunday.

-Cincinnati lost at UConn in overtime, which ended a five game winning streak.  The Bearcats are still in better shape now than they were two weeks ago, but whenever a bubble team loses to a team that’s nowhere close to the bubble, it feels like a big setback, even if it is in overtime on the road.

-Wisconsin had very little trouble with Ohio State yesterday, and continued their dominance at home.  It was a big win for the Badgers as it gets their overall record to 14-10.

-FLORIDA STATE AT DUKE (ACC).  Both teams come into this game highly ranked and with really good profiles.  If Florida State can win this one on the road, they may have a strong case that they belong up on the #1 line.  Either way it is a really good litmus test for both teams to see how good they actually are.

-BAYLOR AT TEXAS (Big 12).  Baylor is the #1 overall team according to Hoops HD, the voters, the committee, and virtually anyone else you talk to.  Texas is outside the bubble and they are going to need a huge win like this so they can land on the right side of it.

-TCU AT TEXAS TECH (Big 12).  Texas Tech is building themselves up, and they should remain safely inside the bubble so long as they’re able to hold serve in games like this

-RADFORD AT WINTHROP (Big South).  If Winthrop wins, they’ll have a three game lead in first place with just five conference games remaining, all of which are against teams with overall losing records.

Posted in CBB on TV, Daily Rundown, Under the Radar | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Under The Radar Game of the Day: Monday, February 10th (and Other News, Notes, and Games)

Bracketology 2020: March Madness Predictions (Version 6.0)

For today’s News, Notes, and Highlighted Games – CLICK HERE

For John Stalica’s UTR Game of the Day – CLICK HERE

For Jon Teitel’s interview with Lou Carnesecca – CLICK HERE

We are only 5 weeks away from Selection Sunday as we continue to make our NCAA tourney predictions. Last March HoopsHD’s Jon Teitel correctly picked 67 of the 68 teams that made the tourney, 63 of which were within 1 spot of their actual seed, including 45 right on the money. He will spend the upcoming months predicting which 68 teams will hear their names called on March 15th. See below for his list of who would make the cut if they picked the field today and if you agree or disagree then feel free to tweet us. To see how we stack up with other websites (ranked 7th out of 133 entries over the past 5 years), check out: www.bracketmatrix.com

SEED: TEAM (CONFERENCE)
1: Kansas (Big 12)
1: Baylor (Big 12)
1: Gonzaga (WCC)
1: San Diego State (MWC)

2: Duke (ACC)
2: Louisville (ACC)
2: Dayton (A-10)
2: West Virginia (Big 12)

3: Maryland (Big 10)
3: Florida State (ACC)
3: Seton Hall (Big East)
3: Villanova (Big East)

4: Auburn (SEC)
4: Butler (Big East)
4: Oregon (Pac-12)
4: Michigan State (Big 10)

5: Penn State (Big 10)
5: Creighton (Big East)
5: Kentucky (SEC)
5: Colorado (Pac-12)

6: Iowa (Big 10)
6: Arizona (Pac-12)
6: LSU (SEC)
6: Marquette (Big East)

7: Illinois (Big 10)
7: Ohio State (Big 10)
7: Rutgers (Big East)
7: Houston (AAC)

8: Wisconsin (Big 10)
8: BYU (WCC)
8: Texas Tech (Big 12)
8: Arkansas (SEC)

9: Michigan (Big 10)
9: Wichita State (AAC)
9: USC (Pac-12)
9: St. Mary’s (WCC)

10: Rhode Island (A-10)
10: Indiana (Big 10)
10: Stanford (Pac-12)
10: Florida (SEC)

11: Purdue (Big 10)
11: Xavier (Big East)
11: Oklahoma (Big 12)
11: Memphis (AAC)
11: Virginia (ACC)
11: VCU (A-10)

12: Northern Iowa (MVC)
12: East Tennessee State (SoCon)
12: Yale (Ivy)
12: Liberty (Atlantic Sun)

13: Stephen F. Austin (Southland)
13: Vermont (America East)
13: Louisiana Tech (C-USA)
13: New Mexico State (WAC)

14: Colgate (Patriot)
14: Wright State (Horizon)
14: Bowling Green (MAC)
14: Winthrop (Big South)

15: AR-Little Rock (Sun Belt)
15: Hofstra (CAA)
15: Murray State (OVC)
15: UC Irvine (Big West)

16: South Dakota State (Summit)
16: Montana (Big Sky)
16: Monmouth (MAAC)
16: North Carolina A&T (MEAC)
16: Prairie View (SWAC)
16: Robert Morris (NEC)

Posted in Bracketology | Comments Off on Bracketology 2020: March Madness Predictions (Version 6.0)