Under the Radar Game of the Day: Hampton at Norfolk State

Hampton at Norfolk State, 8:00 PM Eastern, nsuspartans.com

11 wins.  4 losses.  That is where Hampton sits in MEAC play entering tonight’s regular season finale.  It is also where Norfolk State sits.  And Bethune-Cookman.  And Savannah State.  And North Carolina A&T.   The regular season championship and top seed in the MEAC tournament is wide open tonight as there is an amazing five-way tie entering the final evening of regular season play.  It will all be worked out by the time today’s games come to an end, and a huge piece of the puzzle will be decided in our Under the Radar Game of the Day, the only matchup between two of the five tied teams.

Hampton enters play at 16-14 overall, and holding the top KenPom rating in the conference.  The Pirates have won seven straight games, including a very ugly win at Morgan State last time out, in a game that was called off and forfeited halfway through the second half due to a very ugly fight that allegedly resulted in a Morgan State player having to be removed by law enforcement authorities.  Keep an eye on Jermaine Marrow tonight, as he has put up some huge scoring numbers, including a 35 point output in an earlier win over Bethune-Cookman.

Norfolk State enters play at 13-17 overall.  They Spartans have been led so far this season by Steven Whitley and Alex Long.  Whitley has flirted with triple-doubles all year, including a 15 point, 8 rebound, 10 assist game against Savannah State.  Long is coming off a 16 point and 15 rebound game last time out against Howard.  With 9 wins in their last 10 games, Norfolk State certainly has momentum, and has a chance to be the top seed in the conference tournament that will be played in their home city next week.

Posted in Under the Radar | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Under the Radar Game of the Day: Hampton at Norfolk State

Championship Week Video Notebook: Day 3 (Wednesday)

WELCOME BACK SELECTION COMMITTEE MEMBERS!!  We are here to update you on all the action and tell you what you need to do!!

The Ohio Valley, Big Ten, and Northeast Conference Tournaments got underway on Wednesday.  We review all the action, including two exciting upsets in the NEC, and a game that came down to the wire in the OVC.  We also take a look to tomorrow’s action which includes the A-Sun semis where Lipscomb and Florida Gulf Coast host games, the opening round of what should be an exciting Missouri Valley Tournament, the second round of the Big Ten, the quarters of the OVC and Big South, and more.

We close by updating our SURVIVAL BOARD, which you can see by CLICKING HERE, and by asking our nightly Championship Week Trivia Question.

 

And for all you radio lovers, below is an mp3 version of the show…

SURVIVAL BOARD NOTES

-Rice will be eliminated from Conference USA if they lose to UTEP today

-Cal State Northridge does not play, but will be eliminated from the Big West if UC Riverside wins tomorrow

Atlantic Sun

Big South

Ohio Valley

Patriot League

Big Ten

Missouri Valley

Metro Atlantic

 

 

Posted in Championship Week Video Notebook, News and Notes, Podcasts, Videocasts | Comments Off on Championship Week Video Notebook: Day 3 (Wednesday)

Happy Tourney-versary!: HoopsHD interviews John Montgomery about his father Mike

With the 2018 NCAA tourney tipping off next month, we will spend this month taking a walk down memory lane with a choice collection of coaches who are celebrating an awesome anniversary this year. From an upset of the top-ranked team in the country in the 1958 tourney (60th anniversary) through a 12 vs. 5 upset in the 2013 tourney (5th anniversary), these legends have all carved out a little piece of history in past Marches. We conclude our series with a look at Hall of Fame coach Mike Montgomery. He first became a head coach in 1978, and between stops at Stanford/Cal he had 31 winning seasons in his 32 years as a college head coach. He won more than 650 games, made 12 NCAA tourneys, and was inducted into the College Basketball Hall of Fame in 2016. HoopsHD’s Jon Teitel got to chat with Coach Montgomery’s son John about the 5th anniversary of his father’s 2013 NCAA tourney upset of UNLV and his dad’s influence on John’s own decision to go into coaching.

In the 1991 NIT title game as head coach at Stanford, your dad had all 5 starters score in double-figures in a 6-PT win over Oklahoma: what do you recall about the legendary 9-PT possession late in the 1st half (Andrew Vlahov made 2 FTs, then John Patrick made 4 FTs after Sooners coach Billy Tubbs’ double-technical/ejection, then Kenny Ammann made a 3-PT shot to turn a tie game into a 35-26 Cardinal lead)? I was only 8 years old at the time so I do not remember much but I do remember how great it was to win. I remember some of the players very well: Vlahov was a senior from Australia who was hurt during the regular season but came back to play in the postseason. I remember how disappointing it was a couple of years earlier when the team had a 2-PT loss as a #3-seed to Siena, but winning the NIT in 1991 was exhilarating and a jump start to the success of the Stanford program.

Take me through the 1998 NCAA tourney:
Arthur Lee scored 26 PTS in a 2-PT win over Rhode Island: how nervous were you when Tyson Wheeler stepped to the line for 3 FTs with 5 seconds left? That was 1 of my favorite games as a fan: I was crying tears of joy after the game! We were down quite a bit with a minute to go but had a big steal/dunk to help break through and make it to the Final 4. I do not think that team was even close to 1 of my dad’s best teams but it was a memory that will last a lifetime. I remember Mark Madsen’s celebration after the huge steal that led to the dunk: it is still symbolic of March Madness.

Jeff Sheppard scored 27 PTS in a 1-PT OT win by eventual champion Kentucky: how close did he come to pulling out the win? Pretty darn close! The Wildcats had to play their best to win that game even though nobody gave us a chance to beat them. It could have easily gone our way and we were playing so well that I think we would have won the title over Utah if we had gotten by Kentucky. It was crushing to lose.

In a 4-week stretch during the winter of 2004, Nick Robinson made a 35-foot runner at the buzzer in a 3-PT win over Arizona and Matt Lottich made a 3 while falling out of bounds at the buzzer to cap an 8-PT scoring run in the final 20 seconds/beat Washington State/improve the team’s record to 26-0: how much of a coach’s success do you think is based on skill vs. luck? 1 of my dad’s greatest strengths was the preparation that came with being detail-oriented, which is exactly how you get lucky. I remember watching the Arizona game in my dorm room in college: we did not deserve to win that game but Josh Childress made a huge 3 in the corner and then Robinson made 1 of the greatest shots in Stanford history! You need some luck to go 26-0: it is hard to win in Pullman so to make that shot showed their unity as a team and how much they liked playing with each other. They were as cohesive as can be and knew each other’s strengths. Many of those guys have gone on to become coaches after learning what it takes to win as players.

He was named Pac-10 COY 4 times from 1999-2004 and twice named national COY: what did it mean to him to win such outstanding honors? He won those awards because he had really good teams with multiple appearances as #1 seeds in the NCAA tourney. 1998 was the breakthrough year and then they became the top dog in the Pac-10 and 1 of the best teams in the country. He is proud of those awards: I was there when he got the John Wooden Lifetime Achievement award, which was a big deal for him because Coach Wooden was his role model. We do not talk about awards a lot but it was still a thrill.

In 2004 he was named head coach at Golden State: what is the biggest difference between coaching in college vs. coaching in the pros? His experience was pretty mixed. He is best at putting together a team by putting players in positions to be successful.  When you coach professionals who are making more than you are for 82 straight games it is a bit tough to come into that culture as an outsider. It is challenging to get your players to listen to you and buy in, especially when you are losing. However, I do not think that he would trade that experience for anything.

In 2008 he became head coach at Cal: why did he take the job, and how did his Stanford friends react to the news that he was joining their arch-rival? There were 2 reasons: he wanted 1 more positive experience in coaching after some unfinished business in Golden State and he also wanted to coach alongside me and help me out. The Bay Area is our home and Cal had a pretty good roster coming back that year: if Ryan Anderson had come back to school then I think that we would have been a top-4 seed in the NCAA tourney.

In the 2013 NCAA tourney, Allen Crabbe scored 19 PTS in a 3-PT upset of #5-seed UNLV: how much of a home-court advantage did the Bears have while playing in San Jose, and what made their zone defense (which saw the Rebels miss 16 straight shots in the 2nd half) so effective? Playing 1 hour from home was nice and we had a pro-Cal crowd. We had played UNLV earlier that season and lost so we knew that we had to do something different that March. Our game plan was to play a zone defense and I do not think the Rebels were expecting that. The crowd often cheers for the lower seed in March anyway so I do not know how much of a factor they were, but the Rebels’ offense got a bit stagnant against our zone.

He only had 1 losing season in 32 years as head coach at Montana/Stanford/Cal: how was he able to be so successful for more than 3 decades? That 1 season was in 1992-93: they were awful. They played in the Maui Invitational and lost to D-2 Chaminade in the 7th-place game: it was interesting to be in the locker room and hear some words that I had never heard before! He did a great job of building programs: it was pretty incredible. Obviously you need to have some good players and he was great at recruiting players and evaluating who would fit into his smash-mouth system. He was really good at red-shirting young big men and then helping them develop into good juniors/seniors. He always got the most out of his players and his teams always overachieved.

In November of 2016 he was inducted into the College Basketball Hall of Fame: where does that rank among the highlights of his career? I remember him choking up when he told me about it: I knew that it meant a lot to him because I have rarely heard him get emotional like that.

You are currently an assistant coach at Hawaii: how much of an influence was your dad on your own decision to become a coach? He was a huge influence: I am a coach because of him. I remember growing up when other kids said they wanted to be a firefighter/doctor/etc., but I always wanted to be a college basketball coach. I was a ball boy who got to go into the locker room and attend every game/practice. His players were great role models to me and I listened to all of his press conferences even if they were only on the radio back then. I want to impact young players’ lives and be successful on the court, which is the root of coaching. It is not an easy profession and it has changed a lot over the past few decades in terms of things like social media/salaries. It has become a completely different deal: a lot of guys get into it now for the money/fame/glory. He is an old-school blue-collar guy who came from nothing. His dad was an AD and they were both inducted into the Long Beach State Hall of Fame, which is pretty special.

Posted in Interviews | Tagged , | Comments Off on Happy Tourney-versary!: HoopsHD interviews John Montgomery about his father Mike

Happy Tourney-versary!: HoopsHD interviews former Butler star Matt Howard

With the 2018 NCAA tourney tipping off next month, we will spend this month taking a walk down memory lane with a choice collection of coaches who are celebrating an awesome anniversary this year. From an upset of the top-ranked team in the country in the 1958 tourney (60th anniversary) through a 12 vs. 5 upset in the 2013 tourney (5th anniversary), these legends have all carved out a little piece of history in past Marches. We are switching it up a little bit for the 10th anniversary by continuing our series with former Butler player Matt Howard. He made an instant impact in Indianapolis by being named Horizon ROY in 2008 and helping his team reach the NCAA tourney. He appeared in the NCAA title game in both his junior/senior years and was a 3-time Academic All-American. HoopsHD’s Jon Teitel got to chat with Matt about the 10th anniversary of taking Tennessee to overtime in the 2008 NCAA tourney and being 1 of the best FT shooters in conference history.

You led the state of Indiana with 14.4 RPG as a senior at Connersville High School after ranking #2 in the state with 3.9 BPG as a junior: what is your secret for being a great rebounder and what is your secret for blocking shots? I do not know that I have any secrets or anything along those lines but I think the reason for the rebounding may be twofold. I was taught well about the importance of long rebounds and being able to read where the ball is most likely to come off the rim. This is a skill that can be practiced: the more you work on it, the more you can develop an ability to quickly predict where it is most likely to bounce off the rim. I think this can make any player a better rebounder. In my opinion it is a balance of position/anticipation. In high school I was (believe it or not!) a superior athlete compared to most of the guys I went up against, which I think is a big part of blocking shots. I have not been a shot blocker since those days but blocking shots is at least 80% timing: the rest is about reading the player and knowing his tendencies (such as whether he is right/left-handed or what his go-to move is).

You were the 1st top-100 recruit in Butler history: what made you choose the Bulldogs, and what makes Brad Stevens such a great coach? I had decided that I wanted to stay close to home so as an Indiana kid Butler was an immediate front-runner. When it came down to it I just loved the culture there. The camaraderie between the coaches/players was better than any other place I went to. It was a program that was clearly on the rise so even though I was going to a “mid-major” school there was no doubt that we could compete with the top teams in the nation. Coach Stevens and my class actually started together. In my opinion he was the best coach in the country for multiple reasons. Fundamentally, he understands the game extremely well. For example, all you have to do is check his record when he has a long period of time to prepare for a game or watch the plays he draws up out of timeouts and see how often they are successful. Even with his past success he is always looking for things he can do better and consulting people who he respects. He made me a bigger believer in the importance of having a defensive mindset and being tough. He is not a yeller but is an effective motivator nonetheless, which some people probably do not realize. His calm demeanor has been highly publicized, which is vital in critical situations. In a sense he is the total package.

In 2008 you were named conference Newcomer of the Year: how were you able to come in and contribute right from the start? I was lucky to come in with a very experienced team that actually began the year by starting 5 seniors before I joined the starting lineup midway through the season. This extremely talented team had great chemistry, as it was coming off a Sweet 16 appearance the previous year. This could have been an intimidating/difficult situation but I had great senior leadership from day 1 that really helped prepare me for what I would need to do.

In the 2008 NCAA tourney you scored 4 PTS in a 5-PT OT loss to Tennessee: how on earth were you a #7-seed despite being ranked 11th in the country?! I think that was a big surprise for all of us on that 2008 team. I had never been through a Selection Sunday but I remember it being pretty relaxed: we had won our conference tourney and were expecting to be a #4 or #5 seed. When they announced that we were a #7 seed I remember many of the guys just being shocked and clearly frustrated. I am not sure that I will ever fully understand it…but a couple of years later we went to the title game as a #8-seed. Regardless of your seed it is about winning 6 games in a row, but that did seem like a disrespectful move by the selection committee.

In 2009 you were named conference POY/All-American: what did it mean to you to win such outstanding honors? That was a pretty big honor to win POY in our conference because there were some other deserving players: from a statistical standpoint it probably was my best year. However, I think I understood as well as anyone that this is a “team” award. As a post player I have to be put in a position to be successful and that credit goes to the great team of young players who were around me that year. The Academic All-American award was probably a bigger honor to me personally because the academic side was harder than the basketball side. It means a lot to me since this was something that took a great deal of work.

In the 2009 NCAA tourney you scored 22 PTS before fouling out in a 4-PT loss to LSU: were you getting sick of facing SEC teams every March? Ha ha: yeah! It seemed like this was a big problem every time Butler got to the tourney. The year before I came in the team played eventual champion Florida arguably as well as anybody before falling in the 2007 Sweet 16. Of course it had happened in previous tourneys as well but LSU was just better than us that day. We had a young team and it might have shown because we played catch-up all game long after getting off to a really slow start.

Take me through the 2010 NCAA tourney:
You scored 3 PTS in a 2-PT win over Murray State: could you tell at the time that freshman Isaiah Canaan (who had four 3PM) was going to become a star? The thing I remember was that we played a team with 5 guys who each averaged 9-10 PPG. They were extremely balanced and very difficult to plan for but Canaan was 1 of their most aggressive players even as a freshman. I think that he was as aggressive/strong as any player in that moment, which was impressive for a young player. I am not surprised that he became as good as he is because of what he showed that day.

You scored 9 PTS in a 4-PT win over #1 seed Syracuse: how is your mentality different when facing a #1 seed in the tourney compared to facing any other seed (if at all)? Honestly, 1 of the great things about Coach Stevens is that he prepared us for each team the same way.  When we were playing a #12 or #13 seed he showed us how strong they could be…but also how we could beat them. It was the same with a #1 or #2 seed that we would be playing in the next 2 games. While #1 seeds are hyped up by everyone else, we were not surprised by our ability to win because of the way we were prepared to play and win the game.

You scored 4 PTS in a 2-PT win over Michigan State in Indianapolis: how much of a home-court advantage did you have, and what are your thoughts on fouling your opponent when you have a 3-PT lead in the final seconds of a game (which worked out successfully for you that night)? I think it was quite a big home-court advantage with the percentage of fan support we had, but from what I recall the fans were pretty far removed from the court.  It was more of a dull roar when things happened, not the sharp/piercing atmosphere that you get inside a normal gym. From my experience, I think fouling with just a few seconds left has a higher percentage of success than just taking your chances on defense. If you have a team that you trust to make the smart foul and then make strong block-outs, I would advise fouling anytime you are in that situation with under 7 seconds left in the game. Any more time that that on the clock may put you in a position to lose the game if the FTs do not work in your favor.

You scored 11 PTS in a 2-PT loss to Duke in the title game: how do you think your life would have changed if Gordon Hayward’s half-court shot at the buzzer that hit the backboard had gone in (instead of bouncing off the rim)? I am not really sure, but I have heard over and over from many people who lived through it that things are never the same afterward. Things were pretty crazy for us after the game in terms of appearances/interviews: I cannot imagine what it would have been like had we actually won. However, the biggest thing is that while people tend to forget who finished 2nd, they rarely forget the winner.

Take me through the 2011 NCAA tourney:
You scored 15 PTS including a tip-in at the buzzer for a 2-PT win over Old Dominion, then scored 16 PTS including a FT after Nasir Robinson fouled you with 0.8 seconds left to clinch a 1-PT win over #1 seed Pitt: where does that rank among the best weekends of your life? From a basketball standpoint that 1 ranks right up there with anything I have ever experienced. More than just the personal experience, it was the overwhelming emotion of being able to win 2 really tough/tight games against a pair of very tough/physical teams. The fact that we did not have to go home and watch the tourney was nice, and the way we won may have spearheaded our team to play even better the rest of the way.

You scored 14 PTS in a 3-PT OT win over Florida: what did Coach Stevens tell your team to change its luck at the FT line from regulation (10-20) to OT (7-7)? I do not remember Coach Stevens ever addressing the FT shooting during that game, but rather staying calm/confident throughout our ups and downs. He seemed pretty prophetic after he kept telling us that if we got a few stops that we were going to make the plays we needed to get back in the game. Once that actually happened and it went into OT, we all began to believe that we would win the game. Perhaps that confidence carried into OT and made our FTs go in…or maybe it is because I did not shoot any of them myself!

You scored 7 PTS in a loss to UConn in the title game: do you attribute your team’s atrocious FG% (an all-time title-game worst 18.8%) to a cold shooting night, or the Huskies’ amazing defense, or something else? I am not really sure but I think it was a combination of both. The Huskies were long/strong at almost every position and provided some tough match-ups for us when we were on offense. We played a great game defensively and would have held them under 50 PTS if we did not have to foul at the end. It was not like they took away every open shot we had, but I think we never got comfortable all night long and for that their defense deserves credit.

You hold the Horizon League record for career FTM/FTA: what is your secret for being a great FT shooter? I think the way to become a great FT shooter is largely about repetition. I know many guys who have an “ugly” form and I have been told that my own form is very unorthodox.  However, when you practice and do the same thing over and over the repetition makes it much easier to make FTs under any situation (whether it is a pressure situation or not, whether you are in a familiar gym or not, etc.).

You began your pro career in Greece and currently play for Hapoel Tel Aviv in Israel: what is the biggest difference between pro basketball and college basketball, and what do you hope to do in the future? The game is played much differently from a tactical standpoint. The 24-second shot-clock really changes the way the game is played. The pressure is also on such an elevated level: teams are ready to make changes and think the team is falling apart after only 1-2 losses. It is an impatient world, but amid this added pressure I think it also creates better and more focused players.

Posted in Interviews | Tagged , | Comments Off on Happy Tourney-versary!: HoopsHD interviews former Butler star Matt Howard

Afternoon Puppet Rants About The Stupid Things the NIT is Doing, and the Smart Things They Should Be Doing

So the NCAA, which I guess sees no reason to be busying itself with anything else that’s going on in college basketball at the moment, has come up with some utterly ridiculous rules that they intend to test out during this year’s NIT.  They say that testing it during the NIT will “provide the opportunity to gather invaluable data and measure the experience of the participants.”  Umm, okay.

I’ll begin by examining these experimental rules in a completely objective way, because as you know everything I do is completely objective.  I will then follow up with the rules the NCAA should be using and give an ingenious argument as to why, because as you know every argument that I make is ingenious.

Let’s start with making it so that the shot clock only resets to 20 seconds after an offensive rebound.  I guess they want to speed the game up.  Okay, think of college basketball in the same way you think of love-making.  Some people like to go fast, and that’s great!  Others like to go slow, and you know what? that’s great too!  Part of what’s great about college basketball is that there are all kinds of ways to do it, and we get to see and experience all the different ways that it’s done.  In the NBA, where the rules force the tempo, that’s not the case.  Not everyone likes to go fast!  They shouldn’t have to go fast!  Some teams are really good at going slow, and that’s fine.  I don’t need to collect any invaluable data to know that they should leave the shot clock alone!

Next, let’s move on to quarters.  Why are quarters even a thing??  In any sport??  Seriously??  A hundred or so years ago, who was it that said “Hey, you know what we need to do?  We need have the game clock count down to the point to were the half is half over!”  That is impractical and makes no sense at all!!  That person should have been laughed out of the room.  Instead, not only was this person not laughed out of the room, but his/her ludicrous idea of counting down to a stoppage point in the middle of the half for no real reason was adopted and became the norm.  Truth be told I don’t like quarters in football or the NBA either.  Just put 30 minutes on the clock and play until the half.  This is dumb.  It adds nothing.  I don’t see what “invaluable data” can be collected on the ridiculous notion of counting down to the halfway point of the half.

I’m not as bothered by moving the three point line back or widening the lane, but in saying that I really don’t see the point in it either.  I don’t see how this invaluable data that’s being collected will conclude that it enhances the game.  But…whatever.

Okay, now on to what they should be experimenting with…

TIMEOUTS.  There are an obscene number of timeouts during a college basketball game.  We have the media timeouts at the 16, 12, 8, and 4 minutes of each half.  Plus another full media timeout for the first called time out of each half.  Plus up to six more timeouts that the teams can call.  That’s 16 timeouts in a 40 minute game.  So, I would do two things here.  For starters, each team gets one timeout per half.  That’s it.  Teams don’t need any more than that when they have the media timeouts every four minutes.  Secondly, and I’m not kidding about this, timeouts should not be allowed to be called when the ball is inbounds.  Basketball is the only sport that allows this, and it’s ridiculous.  Good defense can be offset by merely calling timeout.  Teams can’t do that in football.  If the quarterback is rushed out of the pocket and about to be sacked they can’t just call timeout.  A batter can’t pop it up in baseball, or hit into a double play, and prevent it by just calling timeout.  NO OTHER SPORT ALLOWS TIMEOUT TO BE CALLED WHEN THE BALL IS IN PLAY!!!  Basketball shouldn’t either!!

REPLAY.  I’m not for getting rid of it entirely.  I am for eliminating five minute gaps where the officials are watching television in order to get the call right.  A stoppage in play for that long is far more disruptive than a wrong call, especially if it’s that close.  So, this is what I would propose.  The standard needs to be “indisputable evidence.”  If after 60 seconds of watching it on the monitors the referees still are not sure, then by definition there must be some sort of dispute.  Therefore, it is NOT indisputable.  The original call stands, and we get on with the game.  Few things are less enjoyable during a basketball game than watching the referees watch  television for five minutes at a time!  I mean it!  After 60 seconds I want a horn to blow and for the power to the monitor to be turned off!

INTENTIONAL FOULS.  Something else that feels like nails on a chalkboard is the foul parade at the end of most college basketball games.  An intentional foul or a flagrant foul should be defined as just that.  The INTENT is to foul.  If the intent is to play defense and a player inadvertently fouls, then it should be called a foul.  If the intent is to foul and there isn’t even an attempt to play defense, then it should be a flagrant/intentional foul.  This should absolutely be enforced in the final minutes of a game when a team is fouling on purpose.

Be sure to continue to follow us and check out our continuous coverage of Championship Week, where we will review and preview every single conference tournament game for all 32 conferences, as well as our coverage of the rest of the season.  We’ve got a mock selection committee where we build our own brackets and make them look how we think they should look, we’ve got a selection committee guessing expert that is better at guessing the committee than virtually anyone else on earth, we’ve got a highly accurate mathematical/computer ranking system (The JNG) that accurately forecasts the NCAA Tournament.  Don’t ask me how that works because I have no idea, but it does!  We’ve got the Survival Board, and a lot of other things as well.  

Posted in News and Notes | Comments Off on Afternoon Puppet Rants About The Stupid Things the NIT is Doing, and the Smart Things They Should Be Doing

News, Notes, and Highlighted Games: Wednesday, Feb 28th

SURVIVAL BOARD/CHAMPIONSHIP WEEK

-Big Ten, Ohio Valley, and Northeast Conference Tournaments kick off today.  For a rundown of all the action check out our CHAMPIONSHIP WEEK VIDEO NOTEBOOK

-MCNEESE STATE AT TEXAS A&M CORPUS CHRISTI (Southland).  A loss will mathematically eliminate TAMUCC.  This is also Chad Sherwood’s UTR Game of the Day

NEWS AND NOTES

-For Jon Teitel’s All Conference Awards – CLICK HERE

-The Miami Hurricanes picked up what easily their biggest and perhaps most dramatic win of the year.  After leading North Carolina by 17 in the second half, the Tarheels came back and actually hit a three in the final seconds to tie the game.  After what was a joyoous and chaotic scene for a few whole seconds in Chapel Hill, the Canes then hit a shot from just over half court at the buzzer to win the game.  It probably doesn’t knock UNC off the #2 line but it certainly changes the entire complexion of Miami’s resume.

-The shocker of the evening, and maybe for the entire year, was what happened to Saint Joseph’s at home against Rhode Island.  They lost by 30.  At one point they trailed by nearly 40.  Rhode Island is in the rankings, and deservedly so.  I don’t remember the last time a solid tournament team that was clearly in the top half of the bracket lost a home game to a team that was a hundred miles outside the NIT the way Rhody lost last night.  It was preposterous.

-Arkansas, who I’ve been critical of for most of the season, has really been playing well lately and got a big win over an Auburn team last night that is somewhat slumping.

-Some were talking about Mississippi State playing their way onto the bubble.  They lost at home to Tennessee last night by 22.  I don’t think they’re anywhere close to the bubble.

-Florida picked up a huge and impressive win on the road against Alabama.  We still have Bama inside our bubble, but their overall 17-13 record has us shaking a little bit.  They say that doesn’t matter, but it’s kind of hard to not at least subconsciously think about that.  Nevertheless, it would serve Alabama well to pick up a couple more wins either in their final regular season game or in the SEC Tournament.

-Oklahoma was blown out.  Again.  They are now 3-10 in their last 13 games.  While we need to be critical and question Oklahoma, we also need to praise Baylor who played really well last night and for the most part has played really well these past few weeks.

-TCU = Lock.  They had a nice win at home against K State last night.

-And last but not least, Saint Bonaventure, who is right on the bubble, took care of business last night against Davidson!  In overtime.  Actually, three overtimes.  It was an exciting game for sure, and Davidson has been tough throughout Atlantic Ten play, but they are also a borderline NIT team at best.  So when you step away from it, it’s really a situation of the Bonnies avoiding what would have been a critical loss than it is them picking up a key win.

-Boise State will need the auto bid.  They lost last night at San Diego State, who isn’t even an NIT team.

HIGHLIGHTED GAMES

-PROVIDENCE AT XAVIER (Big East).  Providence won the first match-up between these two, but winning at Xavier is an entirely different ordeal.  Xavier can clinch at least a share of first place in the Big East with a win, and get one step closer to earning a #1 seed.

-LSU AT SOUTH CAROLINA (SEC).  Both of these teams are outside the bubble and if either one of them is going to make a move then they need to start winning and follow that up with a run in the SEC Tourney.

-OLE MISS AT KENTUCKY (SEC).  Kentucky is now a virtual lock for the NCAAs and is simply playing for seeding.

-VILLANOVA AT SETON HALL (Big East).  When Nova is at their best, which is seemingly whenever they play against Xavier, then it is almost impossible to beat them.  But, they don’t always play up to their ceiling, and there are times their injuries have exposed them.  They’re coming off of a loss at Creighton and have another tough game tonight against a good Seton Hall team that could still, in theory, play their way into a protected seed if they get hot and pick up several wins in the Big East Tournaent.

-TEXAS A&M AT GEORGIA (SEC).  We still have TAMU inside our bubble, but I get the sense that this is one they have to win.  Georgia looks to be headed to the NIT, and in order to be safe bubble teams can’t be losing to NIT teams, even if it is a road game.

-FLORIDA STATE AT CLEMSON (ACC).  Clemson is a lock and despite being on a bit of a slide still looks like they’re heading for a protected seed.  Florida State is a virtual lock, a win in a game like this could really improve their seed.

-HOUSTON AT SMU (American).  Houston is trying to rebound from a somewhat surprising loss.  They’ll easily make the NCAA Tournament so long as they hold serve, which shouldn’t be hard.

-SYRACUSE AT BOSTON COLLEGE (ACC).  Syracuse is squarely on the bubble, so every game the rest of the way will have a pivotal feel to it.

-BUTLER AT SAINT JOHN’S (Big East).  Butler may not be a complete lock, but they are  virtual lock and we may lock them in tonight if they pick up this win.  The Johnnies have played really well at times, but not consistently enough to have any shot at the field without the automatic bid.

-AIR FORCE AT WYOMING (Mountain West, Front Range).  We at Hoops HD LOVE the Front Range!!  Other than that there is really no reason to watch this game.

-NEVADA AT UNLV (Mountain West).  Nevada should cruise into the NCAA Tournament even if they drop another game or two, which is a good thing because this one may not be so easy.  It’s a rivalry game against a UNLV team that has shown at times that they can play well at home.

Posted in Daily Rundown, News and Notes | Comments Off on News, Notes, and Highlighted Games: Wednesday, Feb 28th