News, Notes, and Highlighted Games: Sunday, Feb 25th

NEWS AND NOTES

LOTS OF LINKS!!

For Jon Teitel’s latest Bracket Projections – CLICK HERE

For Jon Teitel’s interview with UNC Asheville Athletic Director and current Selection Committee member Janet Cone – CLICK HERE

-After playing what was perhaps the singular most impressive game of the season with their decisive win at Xavier and appearing to be in the driver’s seat for a first place finish and a #1 seed, Villanova fell at Creighton.  For the Bluejays it was a much needed win that pulled them out of a bit of a slump.  For Villanova it shouldn’t hurt them that much, especially when you consider that winning the conference tournament will still land them as one of the top 2 teams on the #1 line, but it did expose them a bit.

-Kansas got another hugely impressive road win at Texas Tech yesterday.  It was the third straight loss for Texas Tech and has been battling injuries, but will still be a dangerous team if they can get healthy before March.

-Florida got a much needed win at home against Auburn.  They weren’t in any danger of missing the dance, but this does polish up their resume.

-Arizona has had an interesting week.  We’ll detail some of that in a later post and/or podcast, but for now they lost on the road at Oregon.  They actually played really well for the first thirty minutes or so, but fell apart down the stretch.

-Marquette is on the bubble.  Marquette did not need to lose to a non-tournament team.  Marquette lost at DePaul.  Marquette did not need that.

-TCU got a real nice win and has won three straight.  They have a very solid resume and are now a virtual lock.

-Louisville desperately needed a good win, and they got one yesterday.  They’re still outside our bubble, but are infinitely closer after a road win at Virginia Tech.

HIGHLIGHTED GAMES

-TULSA AT CINCINNATI (American).  Cincinnati is in good shape, but it looks like they need one more big win to secure a protected seed.  If they hold serve and pick up a win against either Wichita State next week or against Houston in the conference tournament then they should get it.

-EAST CAROLINA AT HOUSTON (American).  Houston is coming off a somewhat surprising loss against Houston, and should be able to bounce back today.  If they can’t, then they’re in real trouble.

-MICHIGAN STATE AT WISCONSIN (Big Ten).  Michigan will likely get a #1 seed if they win out through the Big Ten Tournament.

-MINNESOTA AT PURDUE (Big Ten).  Purdue is a virtual lock for a protected seed and should skate into it if they’re able to hold serve.

-COLORADO STATE AT NEVADA (Mountain West).  Nevada has been playing really well and should cruise into the top half of the NCAA Tournament bracket if they’re able to hold serve.

-UCLA AT COLORADO (Pac Twelve).  UCLA is right on the bubble and every game has a pivotal feel.  This is a road game, but it’s against a Colorado team that is nowhere near making the field, so a loss would really hurt UCLA.

-PENN STATE AT NEBRASKA (Big Ten).  Both teams are outside the bubble, but a win today and a strong showing in the Big Ten Tournament could be enough to get one of these teams in.

-FLORIDA STATE AT NC STATE (ACC).  Both teams are in our field, but both have room for improvement.  This is a resume building game and will look good for whichever team pulls it off.

-NORTHERN KENTUCKY AT IUPUI (Horizon League).  Northern Kentucky will clinch first place with a win today.

-FURMAN AT EAST TENNESSEE STATE (SoCon).  East Tennessee State is tied with UNC Greensboro in the standings and can get at least a share of it with a win today.

-SAMFORD AT UNC GREENSBORO (SoCon).  See above..

-IONA AT RIDER (Metro Atlantic).  Rider is tied with Canisius in the conference standings, but won both meetings during the season and owns the tiebreaker.

Posted in News and Notes | Comments Off on News, Notes, and Highlighted Games: Sunday, Feb 25th

Sowing the seeds we love: HoopsHD interviews Selection Committee member/UNC Asheville Director of Athletics Janet Cone

Repost of February 20, 2018 interview by Jon Teitel:

For those of you who simply could not wait 3 more weeks until Selection Sunday to find out what the Selection Committee was thinking, the top-16 teams were revealed in a sneak preview on February 11th. This was not a crystal ball previewing exactly which schools will be protected seeds on March 11th…although 3 of the #1 seeds from last year’s preview DID become #1 seeds last Selection Sunday (Gonzaga/Kansas/Villanova). Rather, it served as a peek behind the curtain at what the committee was thinking and what criteria they were using in their analysis of everyone’s body of work. HoopsHD’s Jon Teitel got to chat with Selection Committee member Janet Cone about how schools put together a schedule and how her Bulldogs are doing this season.

How many hours/week have you been working on selection stuff this month, and what changes would you recommend to keep your fellow committee members from losing their sanity on Selection Sunday? On Sunday after watching my men’s team play and taking care of a few things I spent 3 hours watching games/looking up information/reviewing my notes. We have a framework of how to follow schools but each of us develops the best way to do it efficiently/effectively. I probably spend a minimum of a couple of hours each day working on it, including an hour each morning as I am working out at 4:30AM. I realized a couple of things after first joining the committee. You have a couple of new people each year but 7-8 of us have experience and can share our best practices so that each of us can do the very best job possible. The NCAA staff is so well-organized with their team sheets and can help us look up anything else we need. We also use Synergy so we can go back and watch any important games that we missed.

Which primary conferences are you assigned to this year, and how much weight do you give to input from representatives of these conferences? We have 3-4 conference calls throughout the season. I have 4 conferences as the primary contact and 4 as the secondary contact. We try to get updates on injuries, previews of key games to watch, etc. I keep a notebook and am really fortunate that the conference representatives have provided me with very good information. I am not advocating for any conference: just providing information to the rest of the committee. I have had the SEC in the past, the CAA, the SoCon, the MVC, etc. However, I can never have the Big South because my school (UNC Asheville) is part of that.

What are the major categories that have the biggest impact on a team’s seed (big road win, bad home loss, other), and why are they more important than other categories?What I do is look at as much information as I can to see a school’s whole resume: who you played, where you played, etc. I use the team sheet/nitty gritty sheet, look at injuries, and watch a lot of games.

This season the committee has implemented a new 4-tier system that emphasizes the location of wins/losses: has it made your life easier/harder, and do you think that this new system renders the “eye test” a thing of the past? The new quadrants help us pay more attention to neutral/road games. I also like some of the other metrics that they have added to the top of the team sheets. I am doing my homework by getting the whole breadth of what a team has done throughout the season.

What role do injuries (such as Rawle Alkins of Arizona)/suspensions (such as Terrence Phillips of Missouri) have on a team’s seed (if any)? If I know that a school is missing 3 starters and still wins a game on the road, it makes me think “wow”, while if they lose that game then I will circle that 1 as a discussion point. When we get to New York it is such a paper-thin difference to see which schools are better than other schools. This year you will watch a game on a Tuesday and think that the result is an upset…but then the next night it might not seem as big of an upset depending on what else happens.

If a team wants to make the tourney, are they better off scheduling decent teams who they think they can beat, or great teams who they can only hope to upset, or a nice mix of both, or other? I am an athletic director so I realize that after playing your conference schedule you only have a certain # of games left to play. Some schools need to schedule guarantee games but it is also important to challenge yourself on the road. We also look for good competition in our neutral/home games. As a former women’s coach I always said that scheduling is an art AND a science.  The conference you are in will also determine your non-conference schedule: if you are in a mid-major conference with a couple of teams who are struggling then you might need to schedule some power-conference teams in non-conference play.

For those who want to compare your committee to the College Football Playoff committee, what significance (if any) is there to the fact that 1 is governed by the NCAA and 1 is not? I think the biggest difference is that in football you only play 1 game/week. What makes our committee different is that there are games going on every single night so the rankings are constantly changing, which makes it more challenging for us.

Your UNC Asheville Bulldogs are 19-10 and tied with Winthrop atop the Big South standings: how proud are you of all that they have accomplished? We play Winthrop this Thursday night on ESPNU. I am very proud of what our student-athletes/coaches have done: our 4 seniors (Raekwon Miller/Ahmad Thomas/Kevin Vannatta/Alec Wnuk) just became the winningest senior class in the history of our school!  As a fan I cannot wait until Thursday but regardless of whether we win or lose we just have to come back ready for our next game on Saturday.

Earlier this year NCAA tournament media coordinator David Worlock stated that for the 1st time you and the other committee members will see many other rankings on the official team sheets in addition to the traditional RPI (such as BPI/KPI/KenPom): have you made great use of these advanced metrics in the past, and do you have a favorite 1? I do not have a favorite because I use a lot of different ones for comparison purposes. I try to soak up as much information as I can but the bottom line is that I only get 1 vote so I am just trying to have the very best information and get the very best teams into March Madness. I will watch as many games as I can without getting overwhelmed.

For the 2nd straight year the selection committee unveiled its top-16 seeds in February: what was the reaction like to this year’s unveiling, and what was the most important conclusion from this year’s snapshot? It was a little different this year because we met on a Thursday and did not release the seeds until Sunday so we needed to have a few phone calls in between. When they decided to do it last year I was unsure if it would be a good idea but the public seems to have enjoyed the unveiling. It is just a snapshot of 1 particular day so it changes all the time.

Posted in Interviews, News and Notes | Comments Off on Sowing the seeds we love: HoopsHD interviews Selection Committee member/UNC Asheville Director of Athletics Janet Cone

Bracketology 2018: March Madness Predictions (Version 9)

We are only 2 weeks away from Selection Sunday as we continue to make our NCAA tourney predictions. Last March HoopsHD’s Jon Teitel correctly picked every single 1 of the 68 teams that made the tourney, 63 of which were within 1 spot of their actual seed, including 43 right on the money. He will spend the next 2 weeks predicting which 68 teams will hear their names called on March 11th. See below for his list of who would make the cut if they picked the field today and if you agree or disagree then feel free to tweet us. To see how we stack up with other websites (ranked 4th out of 113 entries over the past 5 years), check out: www.bracketmatrix.com

SEED: TEAM (CONFERENCE)
1: Virginia (ACC)
1: Xavier (Big East)
1: Kansas (Big 12)
1: Villanova (Big East)

2: Duke (ACC)
2: Purdue (Big 10)
2: Michigan State (Big 10)
2: Auburn (SEC)

3: North Carolina (ACC)
3: Cincinnati (AAC)
3: Tennessee (SEC)
3: Texas Tech (Big 12)

4: Wichita State (AAC)
4: Clemson (ACC)
4: West Virginia (Big 12)
4: Arizona (Pac-12)

5: Ohio State (Big 10)
5: Gonzaga (WCC)
5: Kentucky (SEC)
5: Rhode Island (A-10)

6: Michigan (Big 10)
6: Nevada (MWC)
6: TCU (Big 12)
6: Houston (AAC)

7: Arizona State (Pac-12)
7: Florida State (ACC)
7: Texas A&M (SEC)
7: Seton Hall (Big East)

8: Butler (Big East)
8: Oklahoma (Big 12)
8: Alabama (SEC)
8: Missouri (SEC)

9: Florida (SEC)
9: Arkansas (SEC)
9: Creighton (Big East)
9: Miami FL (ACC)

10: Virginia Tech (ACC)
10: St. Mary’s (WCC)
10: NC State (ACC)
10: Kansas State (Big 12)

11: Providence (Big East)
11: St. Bonaventure (A-10)
11: USC (Pac-12)
11: Texas (Big 12)
11: Baylor (Big 12)
11: Syracuse (ACC)

12: Middle Tennessee (CUSA)
12: Loyola-Chicago (MVC)
12: New Mexico State (WAC)
12: Louisiana-Lafayette (Sun Belt)

13: Vermont (America East)
13: South Dakota State (Summit)
13: Buffalo (MAC)
13: Murray State (OVC)

14: East Tennessee State (SoCon)
14: Charleston (CAA)
14: Rider (MAAC)
14: Montana (Big Sky)

15: Bucknell (Patriot)
15: Northern Kentucky (Horizon)
15: UC Santa Barbara (Big West)
15: Penn (Ivy)

16: Wagner (NEC)
16: UNC Asheville Big South)
16: Florida Gulf Coast (Atlantic Sun)
16: Nicholls State (Southland)
16: Southern (SWAC)
16: Savannah State (MEAC)

Posted in Bracketology | Comments Off on Bracketology 2018: March Madness Predictions (Version 9)

Under the Radar Game of the Day: Iona at Rider

Iona at Rider, 2:00 PM Eastern, gobroncs.com

The Rider Broncs have a chance to take the Metro Atlantic regular season title today when they host the Iona Gaels in our Under the Radar Game of the Day.  By virtue of the tiebreaker rules, a win will guarantee the 1 seed to the Broncs, no matter what Canisius does, while a loss will guarantee the title to the Golden Griffins.  Rider currently sits at 21-9 overall, after defeating Canisius at home last weekend and then suffering a lop-sided upset loss at Monmouth on Thursday night.  Dimencio Vaughn led the way in the Canisius win with 22 points and 9 rebounds.  Another big effort may be necessary today against an always-dangerous Iona team

Iona enters today’s game at 17-12 overall and 11-6 in MAAC play, half a game behind third place Niagara.  The Gaels picked up a win on Friday night over their top rival, Manhattan, by 13 points.  Schadrac Casimir had a huge game for Tim Cluess’ team in that win, scoring 30 points.  Also keep an eye on Rickey McGill who had 13 points and 9 assists in the first meeting between these two teams, which was won by Rider 91-64.  That game may have been a blowout, but Rider should not be celebrating the championship quite yet – it is almost March and you can never count out Iona in the MAAC in March.

Posted in Under the Radar | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Under the Radar Game of the Day: Iona at Rider

Happy Tourney-versary!: HoopsHD interviews longtime coach Eddie Biedenbach

With the 2018 NCAA tourney tipping off next month, we will spend this month taking a walk down memory lane with a choice collection of coaches who are celebrating an awesome anniversary this year. From an upset of the top-ranked team in the country in the 1958 tourney (60th anniversary) through a 12 vs. 5 upset in the 2013 tourney (5th anniversary), these legends have all carved out a little piece of history in past Marches. We continue our series with former head coach Eddie Biedenbach. After playing at NC State and later in the NBA, he returned to his alma mater and won the 1974 NCAA title as an assistant to Norm Sloan.  He later served as head coach at Davidson/UNC Asheville and won more than 250 games in his career. HoopsHD’s Jon Teitel got to chat with Coach Biedenbach about the 15th anniversary of the 2003 NCAA tourney (the 1st tourney appearance in Bulldogs history) and beating Michael Jordan in the 1983 NCAA tourney.

You played for 3 legendary coaches at NC State in the 1960s (Everett Case/Press Maravich/Norm Sloan): who was your favorite, and which 1 gave you the best advice about how to be a great coach? I benefited from all of them: Lou Pucillo was my freshman coach and was also great. The 1 that was subtly influencing was Case. He only coached me for 2-3 games before retiring for health reasons in 1964, but he had a great influence on Sloan as well as many of my older teammates. I cannot say that any single 1 of them had the greatest influence.

After your junior year you were drafted in the 9th round by St. Louis but you decided to return for your senior year: why did you decide to come back, and did you have any regrets? No regrets at all. I had hurt my back and was barely strong enough to play as a senior. The injury was tougher than I thought and I realized that I would not be able to compete in the NBA.

After your senior year you were drafted by teams in 3 separate pro sports leagues: NBA (Lakers), ABA (Nets), and NFL (Cowboys): how close did you come to going to the NFL, and why did you choose the NBA over the ABA? My dream was always to play in the NBA, which is why I chose the Lakers over the Nets. I was a good high school football player and had good hands but did not have enough speed/muscle to play in college, much less the NFL.

After a 7-game NBA career with Phoenix you retired and later became an assistant under Sloan for 9 years at your alma mater, where you recruited future Hall of Famer David Thompson: how did you like coaching under Sloan after previously playing for him, and when could you tell that Thompson was going to become a star? The very 1st time I saw Thompson in person was when he was in high school. I watched him on tape and could tell that he could jump but when I saw him in the layup line in person I realized that he was special. I called Coach Sloan at halftime because I knew that Thompson was better than anyone I had ever seen at that age.

Your 1973 Wolfpack team finished 27-0 but was banned from the NCAA tourney and placed on probation due to you playing in a pickup game with Thompson while he was a high school student in 1970: do you think that 1973 team would have won the tourney, and how did you feel about the probation? I played in the game at our own basketball camp while David was there for orientation. He was playing in a pickup game and at the time I was in the cafeteria. I went back to the gym to bring the campers to the cafeteria for dinner and the guys in the game asked me to fill in for about 15 minutes. I did not even know who half of them were. They reported it as an illegal out-of-season tryout, which was ridiculous. There were some minor violations but a lot of the allegations were untrue. That undefeated team was great: the extra year of experience helped us win it all the following season. You need to have a lot of breaks to win the title so I do not know if David could have helped us beat UCLA in 1973: they were really good back then. Even though we beat some great Maryland/UNC teams in ACC action, I learned that 1 bad play can make the difference.

What are your memories of the 1974 ACC tourney title game in Greensboro (Tom Burleson had 38 PTS/13 REB in a 3-PT OT win over Maryland featuring 10 future NBA draft picks and no turnovers during regulation, which is why many people consider it to be 1 of the best college basketball games of all-time)? I cannot say that it was more exciting than the UCLA game, but the Maryland game was perhaps the best game I have ever witnessed. The magnitude was huge because the loser would not go to the NCAA tourney even though we were both among the top teams in the country. We always felt that we had a good chance to win due to Thompson. It was a phenomenal atmosphere dating back to our 1st game against the Terps, which had taken place on Super Bowl Sunday. Those big son-of-a-guns battled each other and Burleson was inspired after the previous game when Len Elmore said that he was better than Tommy. Maryland shot 64% from the field and we were right around 60%. There were no fast-break layups at all. It was awesome to watch the game as it was happening…but watching it later on tape was equally awesome!

Take me through the magical 1974 NCAA tourney, where you were an assistant coach for NC State:
Thompson scored 40 PTS in a win over Providence: how much of a home-court advantage while playing in Raleigh, and did you get the sense that Thompson was going to take you all the way to a title? We knew that David was the best player on the court but you need to have great balance from every player so that the defense cannot concentrate on 1 particular guy: nobody can win an NCAA title all by themselves. It was definitely an advantage to not have to travel all over the country but the disadvantage is that the fans/hangers-on are a distraction. Everyone wants a ticket/autograph so you just have to stay focused on the job at hand.

Thompson landed on the back of his head during a win over Pitt and was rushed to the hospital to get 15 stitches: how bad did you fear the injury was, and did you think that your season had come to a stunning conclusion? I never thought about the season: my concern was for David. I went out on the floor with our physician and thought I saw blood coming out of his ear, but it was from a cut on the back of his head. I saw his legs quivering and really thought that he was dying: I get emotional even now when I think about it. They took him off on a stretcher but he came back in the 2nd half with a bandage on his head.

Thompson had 28 PTS/10 REB in a 3-PT 2-OT win over UCLA (Bill Walton had 29 PTS/18 REB) to end their 38-game NCAA tourney winning streak: was your team out for revenge after receiving its only loss of the season at the hands of the Bruins earlier that year, and where does that clash of titans rank among the best you have ever seen? From the standpoint of UCLA winning 7 straight titles, it was 1 of the best wins of my career. I do not think it was a revenge game but our players definitely wanted to prove themselves, which they did. Sitting on the sideline I felt like I was at a pro game that just had younger faces. Every 1 of those guys was a big-time/strong player and it was really a battle. We were a little inexperienced: some of our players started to celebrate after Walton picked up his 3rd foul but backup center Swen Nater came in and kicked our butt. We learned a lot about ourselves and without that game I do not know if we would have had the maturity to win it all.

Thompson scored 21 PTS and was named tourney MOP in a title game win over Marquette: how did the momentum change after Coach Al McGuire picked up 2 technical fouls late in the 1st half, and what was the feeling like in your locker room afterwards? After we beat UCLA, Burleson and I immediately started to focus on Marquette because we did not go to the tourney just to beat the Bruins. That is where Coach Sloan did his best job: he kept us focused like we needed to be. The technical fouls were significant but we won 10 straight against Maryland and 9 straight against UNC because we were a special team. Burleson knew that Maurice Lucas was good because they had won a gold medal together for team USA at the 1973 World University Games.

In 1981 you finished 1st in the conference as coach at Davidson but left after the season: why did you decide to leave, and did you have any regrets? They did not renew my contract because they did not want me there anymore. I joke that I left due to “illness”: they were sick of me! I did not want to leave but they did not want a powerful coach in charge. It is important to place academics over athletics…but there is room to have both. It was hard on me because I did a good job there: it just had to do with personalities.

Take me through the 1983 NCAA tourney as an assistant coach for Georgia:
Lamar Heard scored on a tip-in with 2 seconds left in a 2-PT win over VCU in Greensboro after your team held the ball for the final 80 seconds to get the last shot: did you think that Heard’s hand was over the rim when he made contact with the ball, and do you feel that justified the strategy of holding onto the ball for so long? Lamar was the greatest kid in the world. The controversy was whether or not he touched the ball: the ball was definitely on the rim but the official said he did not touch it. I asked Lamar after the game if he touched it…and he gave me an answer! Hugh Durham was a great coach and a great teacher of the game: that was a big win for us.

Terry Fair scored 27 PTS REB in 40 minutes in a 3-PT win over #1-seed St. John’s in Syracuse (Chris Mullin had 19 PTS): how were you able to get the win, and could you tell at that time that Mullin was going to become a star? Terry was a great player for us. Mullin was great, as was their center Bill Wennington (who I had recruited in the past). I learned an awful lot about scouting: I think St. John’s was more talented but we played the game better, which is what made the difference. We did not take bad shots and they made a mistake by not playing a zone defense against us.

James Banks scored 20 PTS in a 5-PT upset win over UNC (Michael Jordan had 26 PTS), which allowed you to advance to the Final 4 in your very 1st tourney appearance: how big a deal was it to beat the defending national champs, and could you tell at the time how legendary Jordan would become? Coach Dean Smith had a good strategy but Durham’s strategy was better and he knew what each of our opponents could do. Everyone thought Jordan was great but I do not think anyone thought that he would go on to do what he did in the NBA. I still think that David was the better college player. 1 of my college buddies was the football coach at Laney High School where Jordan was a student and I remember talking to Jordan back in the day. My daughters also ended up going to Laney. The difference in guys like David/Jordan was their desire to be the best, how hard they played, and the passion they had for winning. Coach Sloan would tell our guys not to try to play great, just to play good/play hard.

Thurl Bailey/Dereck Whittenburg each scored 20 PTS in a 7-PT win for Jim Valvano and eventual champion NC State: were they just a team of destiny that year, and how did it feel for you to lose to your alma mater? Valvano would slow down the tempo and use a bunch of different defenses. We went into that game wanting to win it as bad as any other game, but we missed elbow jumpers and fell too far behind to catch them. I was very disappointed that we did not win that game. I love NC State and always want them to win…just not that game!

In 1996 you became head coach at UNC Asheville, where you finished 1st in the conference during each of your 1st 2 years: how were you able to come in and have so much success so quickly? It was a combination of the system we used as well as players like Josh Pittman. He was just emerging as a very good player and it worked out well for us.

In 2000 you pulled off the 6th-biggest comeback in D-1 history at the time by beating Coastal Carolina despite trailing by 26 PTS: how were you able to do it, and how do you keep your players from simply giving up? It was due to them shooting too many 3-PT shots: I believe that you can shoot yourself both into and out of a lead. I am not a fan of VMI’s run-and-gun style: it can give you notoriety and help you score a lot of points but it will not work if you are trying to win several games in a row as you need to do to win a conference/national championship. You need to have inside play and be able to get your opponents into foul trouble.

What are your memories of the 2003 NCAA tourney, the 1st tourney appearance in school history (you became the 1st coach in Big South history to win a tourney game with an 8-PT OT win over Texas Southern thanks to 28 PTS from Andre Smith, then lost to #1-seed Texas)? Rick Barnes was the Longhorns coach: he was an assistant for me at Davidson a quarter of a century earlier. Dayton was a tremendous place to have a tourney game: the fans up there are just phenomenal. We played very well thanks to our 2 great guards: Smith was our leader and helped make our entire team go. We also had 3 freshmen step up in OT after our starters got in foul trouble.

Your 2 other assistant coaches at Davidson turned out to be pretty good as well (Bob McKillop/Jeff Bzdelik): was that the best coaching staff you have ever been a part of? I can say that now but did not realize it at the time. We were a great staff but all became better as we learned to understand the game better. We enjoyed both basketball and life. I was the veteran of the group despite being in my early 30s at the time: it was a very young group of guys.

Posted in Interviews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Happy Tourney-versary!: HoopsHD interviews longtime coach Eddie Biedenbach

Under the Radar Game of the Day: Harvard at Penn

Harvard at Penn, 7:00 PM Eastern, Ivy League Digital Network

It is the Game of the Year in the Ivy League, and it also may be meaningless, so it is naturally the Under the Radar Game of the Day.  The Ivy League’s top two teams, Harvard and Penn, meet at the Palestra in Philadelphia tonight.  Both teams enter play tied at 10-1 in conference play with only two more regular season games left after tonight.  That means that the winner has the upper hand for the #1 seed in the Ivy League tournament.  Harvard won the first meeting between these two teams back on February 10 by 9 points.  Chris Lewis led all scorers with 25 points for the Crimson in that win, while Penn’s Ryan Betley was one of four Quakers in double figures, scoring a team high 16.  All signs point to a great game tonight.

The above having been said, tonight’s game may also prove to be fairly meaningless.  Even if the winner ends up securing the 1 seed, the conference tournament is played in Philadelphia, no matter who wins, and these two teams should both be prohibitive favorites to win their semifinals and advance to the championship game.  Assuming that Harvard and Penn play again on Sunday, March 11, the game will be for “all the marbles”.  Tonight, at best, we will get a very fun preview of that title game.  No matter what the meaning of the game, we will certainly be watching!

Posted in Under the Radar | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Under the Radar Game of the Day: Harvard at Penn