Season Preview: HoopsHD interviews Hall of Famer Cheryl Miller

There are a lot of great basketball coaches in Los Angeles but there is little doubt that the 1 who was the best player is Cheryl Miller, currently working as the women’s basketball coach at Cal State LA.  We are running out of Hall of Fames into which to induct her: Basketball Hall of Fame in 1995, Women’s Basketball Hall of Fame in 1999, and FIBA Hall of Fame in 2010.  The reasons why are pretty obvious: 2-time national high school POY, 3-time national college POY and 2-time NCAA tourney MVP at USC, and 1984 Olympic gold medalist.  She has not been too shabby as a coach either: NCAA tourney appearances during each of her 2 years as coach at her alma mater and a trip to the 1998 WNBA Finals as coach of the Phoenix Mercury.  HoopsHD’s Jon Teitel got to chat with Coach Miller about her legendary playing career and how she likes being a coach.

As a 6’2” player at Riverside Polytechnic High you won 4 consecutive state titles, scored a state-record 105 PTS in a 1982 win over Norte Vista High School, and made what are believed to be the 1st 2 dunks by a woman in organized competition: how on earth did you score triple digits, and what was the reaction like when you dunked in a game? I had previously scored 60-65 PTS in a game, after which my brother Reggie was joking around and wondering if I could score 100. It was 1 of those special nights when everything went in: the basket looked huge and I had 80 PTS by halftime. I looked at my coach in the locker room and he said, “I think you are going to do this!” The dunk occurred at a home game when I got a breakaway. Dunking was not easy for me because I have small hands. It was not like a Brittany Griner dunk: THAT is a dunk! I remember backpedaling after I dunked and seeing my dad in the crowd: his jaw just dropped. The whole crowd was going crazy as well.

You were the most heavily recruited female athlete of all time with 250+ scholarship offers: what made you choose USC? When I was a high school senior you had to pay your own way to fly to colleges for recruiting visits, so from a financial standpoint we just could not afford to fly all over the country. I am a daddy’s girl and wanted to stay close to home. I remember the McGee twins walking into my living room and sitting down very close to me on the couch while Coach Linda Sharp talked to my dad in the kitchen. Paula leaned toward me and said, “You can play 2 years with us or 2 years against us”, and after that I was sold. It was a no-brainer for me with the prestige/history of the Trojans. She did not get a lot of credit for it but Coach Sharp was a great recruiter. Only 1-2 of her phone calls to me were about basketball: the majority were about other things in my life like academics/prom, which meant the world to me.

In the 1983 NCAA tourney title game you scored 27 PTS but missed the front end of 1-and-1 with 6 seconds left and a 2-PT lead over Louisiana Tech: did you think that Kim Mulkey’s 18-foot jumper at the buzzer was going in, and what did it mean to you to be named tourney MOP as a freshman? After I missed the FT my mind started spinning. Kim just took off in another gear: I was trailing her down the court and when she took the shot I was kicking myself because I thought that I had cost our team the championship. I grabbed the rebound after she missed and just kicked the ball as hard as I could. I could not believe that I was named MOP: my teammates did so much for me so that award could have gone to any of us. It reminded me of all the hard work that I had put in since I was a little girl playing against my brothers.

In the 1984 NCAA tourney title game you scored 16 PTS and were named tourney MOP yet again after an 11-PT win over Tennessee: what was the crowd like at Pauley Pavilion? There are only a couple of Bruins in my life who I adore: my brother Reggie and Ann Meyers Drysdale. I had never had a decent game at Pauley during my 1st 2 years of college so to win a title there and climb up on the rim was a little “extra, extra”. It was also special because we beat 1 of the best coaches ever in Pat Summitt.

A few months later you helped team USA win an Olympic gold medal: what was it like playing for Coach Summitt, and how devastating was it to miss out on the 1988 Olympics due to a right knee injury? I figured that Coach Summitt did not like me after the title game and thought that I was cocky/arrogant. Our Olympic practices were tougher than our games: we learned so much about discipline and directing our emotions in a positive way so that they would not become a distraction. By the time we arrived at the Olympics Coach Summitt and I had reached a meeting of the minds. I got on her bad side after 1 practice where I kicked the ball after getting low-bridged. We were in the locker room at halftime and she was just chewing out every single player but for some reason she skipped over me, which made me feel that there is a God! Then she said, “Oh, I forgot 1 person, how could I forget Cheryl Miller!?”…and she benched me for the entire 2nd half. A day or 2 later she came into my room and asked me how we were going to work this out. I told her that I played to win, just like she did, but that we went about it differently: I was more passionate while she was more controlled. After that it was great. It was a big deal to miss out in 1988. Look at a guy like Derrick Rose: before his injuries he was phenomenal. However, back in the 1980s when I played we did not have the medical technology available for me to come back and be the same player I was before my injury, which was the most devastating thing.

In the 1986 NCAA tourney title game you scored 16 PTS before fouling out in a loss to Texas: where does that undefeated Longhorns team rank among the best that you have ever seen? To this day I have never watched that game and I never will. Clarissa Davis was a great athlete and Jody Conradt was a great coach: they were a phenomenal team who went 12 deep.

You finished your college career as a 4-time All-American/3-time national POY: do you feel like you are the best women’s college basketball player ever? I feel that I am 1 of many. When I look at the great players who came before me like Ann (whom I patterned my game after), Lynette Woodard, Nancy Lieberman, etc., I just tried not to embarrass myself.

After graduating you were offered a job with the Harlem Globetrotters: how close did you come to accepting the offer, and do you ever wonder how good a pro you would have been had you been healthy? My handles were shaky so there was no way that I could have been a Globetrotter, although I had personality in spades. Lynette was the perfect woman for that position at the time. For some reason it was just meant to be: if I had remained healthy and ended up playing pro overseas then a lot of other doors in my life (like broadcasting/coaching) might have closed.

In 1995 you were inducted into the Basketball Hall of Fame: where does that rank among the highlights of your career? When I 1st learned that I was a nominee I felt that it would be cool but did not think that I would ever be elected. They said they would give me a final answer in 72 hours…which were the longest 72 hours of my life. When they finally called back 3 days later I remember them saying “Congratulations” but the rest of the conversation was a blur. All I heard was screaming: I was worried that the neighbors were in trouble…and then I realized that it was me who was screaming! It was a thrill for my parents to be a part of that because they had made so many sacrifices for us. You get to select who walks you down the aisle: I wanted Ann but she was already taken so I asked 1 of my other idols (Dr. J), who agreed to do it. As we were walking up to the podium he asked me if I was cold because my knees were shaking and my teeth were chattering so much!

You made the 1998 WNBA Finals as head coach/GM of the Phoenix Mercury: how close did you come to beating a Houston team that went 27-3 during the regular season, and what was it like to face Finals MVP/former college teammate Cynthia Cooper? There are certain games that haunt you and Game 2 of that series is 1 of them. I think we were up by 9-10 PTS with a few minutes to go and I could almost hear the champagne corks popping in the locker room, but then Cynthia/Sheryl Swoopes/Tina Thompson shifted into a whole other realm of greatness. I think that Cynthia is the hardest-working/most-underrated Hall of Famer that I have ever met.

Your brother Darrell played pro baseball, your sister Tammy played college volleyball, and your brother Reggie was a Hall of Fame NBA player: who is the best athlete in the family? There is no question: I am! When you are talking about bragging rights in the Miller family, heck yeah!

Last year you were hired as head coach at Cal State Los Angeles: why did you take the job, and what do you hope to do in the future? I spent a couple of years coaching at Langston University in Oklahoma: I did not realize how difficult it would be but I was glad to have the opportunity. It is nice to come back to LA: we played our summer league Olympic Development games here so it kind of feels like coming full-circle. It is wonderful to sleep in your old bed. You have to set the bar high to develop a culture of accountability/passion/discipline. I try to instill perfection in an imperfect game and develop that mentality in a group of young women: you push and then applaud. I know what worked for me as a player: I did not have a problem with coaches who got in my face but I did not like it when they stayed in my face. You have to tell them how special they are and what they need to do. I hear that there is a different breed of athlete today and I can see some entitlement issues, but they want to win so my job is to show them how to win in the right way.

Posted in News and Notes | Tagged , | Comments Off on Season Preview: HoopsHD interviews Hall of Famer Cheryl Miller

Season Preview: HoopsHD interviews Hall of Famer Vicky Bullett

It may seem like the Big East has cornered the market on coaches who were Hall of Fame players (Patrick Ewing/Chris Mullin) but do not sleep on the D-2 Mountain East Conference.  Last year West Virginia Wesleyan hired Vicky Bullett to coach their women’s basketball team and the Lady Bobcats hope to get even better this season.  Coach Bullett’s resume as a player is rather remarkable: 1989 ACC POY at Maryland, 1992 Olympic gold medalist for Team USA, and 1999 WNBA All-Star.  In 2011 she was inducted into the Women’s Basketball Hall of Fame and then spent several years as the head coach at Hagerstown Community College before returning to her home state of West Virginia.  HoopsHD’s Jon Teitel got to chat with Coach Bullett about winning a gold medal and becoming a Hall of Famer.  

1 of your 6 brothers (Don) coached your team at Martinsburg High School and drove you 6 hours round-trip so that you could practice with your AAU team: what was it like to play for your brother, and how much of an impact did he have on your life? It is always hard because any sibling would put more pressure on you than a stranger would. He has always pushed me to work hard on the court and in the classroom and helped prepare me for my freshman year at Maryland.

In the 1988 Olympics you played for team USA: what did it mean to you to win a gold medal? The team was exceptional. Now they select players but back then there were probably 300 women who tried out. I was 1 of the youngest players and I learned a lot.

In 1989 you were named ACC POY/All-American at Maryland: what did it mean to you to receive such outstanding honors? They were struggling when I first got there because they had some players who had transferred out. I thought about going to Tennessee but they already had a stacked team. My dad suggested I go to Maryland so I could play right away and it was an honor to receive those awards.

In the 1989 ACC tourney title game you were named tourney MVP after getting 30 PTS/16 REB in a win over NC State: how were you able to play your best when it mattered the most? We had a good team but Coach Chris Weller only played about 7 of us, including All-American Deanna Tate. As a senior you want to accomplish a lot and we got pumped up to play against our ACC opponents: we were destined to do well that year.

Take me through the 1989 NCAA tourney:
You scored 28 PTS and your team had a tourney-record 25 STL in a win over Stephen F. Austin: what is the key to playing great defense? My brother told me that I had to play defense if I wanted to make the Olympic team in 1988: it was a tool that he expressed a lot. Most athletes do not like to get scored on and I always wanted to be a complete player. Defense was the key factor in us making it to the Final 4.

In the Final 4 you had 20 PTS/10 REB in a loss to eventual champion Tennessee: where does that rank among the most devastating losses of your career? It was not devastating: the Volunteers had a great team. They called us a Cinderella team due to our small bench. We just ran into a good player like Bridgette Gordon and a great coach like Pat Summitt.

You broke the school’s all-time scoring/rebounding marks as a junior and graduated with 1928 PTS/968 REB: how were you able to balance your scoring with your rebounding? You just have to do both. Our coach did not play around: you either boxed out on rebounds or ran the steps at Cole Field House! I was disciplined enough to just go out there and do my best.

You were a 4-time All-Star in the Italian League: what is the biggest difference between college basketball and pro basketball? College basketball has some gimmick defenses but in the pros it is more 1-on-1. A lot of foreign players are very good on offense so there are less schemes overseas than there are in the US.

On July 3, 2001 you set a WNBA record by playing 55 minutes in Washington’s 4-OT win over Seattle: how exhausted were you by the end of the night? I remember that game very well. It was late in my career and the coach tried to keep me to a certain level of minutes, but we just reached a point where she said she needed me to play. I probably paid for it the next couple of days but at the time I was not that exhausted. I had to guard 6’5″ center Lauren Jackson, which also took a lot out of me.

In 2011 you were inducted into the Women’s Basketball Hall of Fame: where does that rank among the highlights of your career? It was a great highlight. I escorted my head coach at Maryland to the ceremony the previous year. People told me that Vivian Stringer was looking for me and she said that I was up for it the next year: I thought she might have been offering me a job! It kind of completes the package for all that you have contributed to the sport.

You currently are head coach of the women’s basketball team at West Virginia Wesleyan: how do you like the job? It is going well but I hate recruiting.

Posted in Interviews | Tagged , | Comments Off on Season Preview: HoopsHD interviews Hall of Famer Vicky Bullett

Season Preview: HoopsHD interviews Walt Williams about new Coppin State head coach Juan Dixon

HoopsHD begins its annual season preview series by focusing on new Coppin State head coach Juan Dixon.  This year marks the 15th anniversary of 1 of the highlights of Coach Dixon’s career: winning the 2002 NCAA title as a member of the Maryland Terrapins and the MOP award as the best player in the tourney.  After graduating with the most 3PM in school history, he was drafted in the 1st round of the 2002 NBA draft by the Wizards and spent a decade in the NBA/overseas.  The Eagles are hoping he can bring some of his March Magic back to his hometown of Baltimore, where his aunt Sheila served as the city’s 1st female mayor.  HoopsHD’s Jon Teitel got to chat with Walt Williams about his fellow Maryland All-American and what made him such a great player.

Maryland coach Gary Williams 1st noticed Juan at an AAU tourney in Georgia when he dove for a ball while his team was down by 20 PTS with 2 minutes to go: what made Williams such a great coach? Hustle was a huge part of Juan’s makeup: he would not have been half the player he was if he did not play so hard. His toughness helped him get to the next level but he also had quickness and fantastic skills. Gary grabbed that intensity out of all of his players so we always played hard. He emphasized our effort level but would not get on our case if we missed a shot.

Take me through the 2001 NCAA tourney:
Juan scored 13 PTS in a 10-PT win over Georgetown: what did it mean to you to see your alma mater beat a team that used to be 1 of your main archrivals until the schools discontinued the annual series in 1980? We are the top 2 teams in the area so we always hoped for the opportunity to get bragging rights in the DMV. 1 of my biggest regrets is that I did not get to play against them more.

Maryland was up by 22 PTS in the 1st half of the Final 4 before eventual champion Duke came all the way back to win by double-digits: where does that rank among the most devastating losses of his career? We were controlling the game until Duke became more aggressive and the referees allowed them to be a lot more hands-y.

In 2002 he was named ACC Athlete of the Year/1st-team All-American: what did it mean to him to win such outstanding honors? I think it meant a great deal to him after he overcame some personal battles and had the confidence in himself and a coach who believed in him. He was not a top player coming into college but the coaching staff taught him how to play and it resulted in him becoming a great player.

In the 2002 NCAA tourney title game he scored 18 PTS to beat Indiana en route to being named tourney MOP: what did it mean to him to win the title, and how did being named MOP change his life? That is something that you will have the rest of your life. It was a veteran-laden team in an era of 1-and-done players who were heavily recruited. Gary chose to recruit guys who would stay in the program for 4 years and he helped them grow so that they would be great as seniors who played together as a team. They had players at every position across the board and they bought into what Gary was saying. Juan rose to the occasion and made big shots down the stretch.

He remains the all-time leading scorer in school history: did he realize at the time how prolific a player he was, and do you think that anyone will ever break his record? The best players do not usually stick around anymore…but if someone comes in and has a good freshman year and remains consistent for all 4 years then I think it could be done. You also need to stay healthy and be valuable to the team.

His 333 career STL remains in the top-20 all-time in D-1 history: what was his secret to being a great defender? He was a scrappy player: if he was just a scorer then he would not have made it to the NBA because he was just not big enough to be a SG. 1 thing he did as he got older was to understand what would occur before it happened due to his great anticipation. Coach Williams always had an aggressive mentality so the 2 of them were a perfect match.

In the summer of 2002 he was drafted 17th overall by Washington (6 spots ahead of Tayshaun Prince): did he see that as a validation of his college career, or the realization of a lifelong dream of reaching the NBA, or other? It was a dream come true for me when I was a 1st round pick a decade before that so I assume it was the same for him. It is great to reach the pinnacle but it is short-lived because you have to put in a lot of work to survive when facing the best players in the world. You have to do a lot of work on your own to last as long as he did. 1 of the biggest reasons I went to Maryland was the chance to play in front of my family/friends.

In Game 4 of the 2005 Eastern Conference quarterfinals he scored a career-high 35 PTS (in 31 minutes off the bench) in a 7-PT win over Chicago: was it just 1 of those situations where every shot he put up seemed to go in because he was “in the zone”? He was definitely in the zone but he was able to get into the flow longer because he kept making important shots. Everything worked out for him on that particular night and the coach had a comfort level that allowed him to stay out there.

After leaving the NBA he played in Greece/Spain/Turkey: how does pro basketball overseas compare to college basketball? The foreign game is more team-oriented. In college you have to rely on your coaches a lot but in the NBA it is a bunch of superstars who want to prove that they are the best, so there is more of an isolation game then there is ball movement until you find the open guy (like they do so well in San Antonio).

His older brother Phil was a D-3 basketball All-American, his half-brother Jermaine played at Pitt, and his 2nd cousin Brandon Driver played football at San Jose State: who is the best athlete in the family, and do you credit at least some of his success to genetics? Phil was a good player but Juan was more athletic. Juan did not have the best vertical leap but could move quickly and change directions, which allowed him to get into passing lanes.

Posted in Interviews | Tagged , | Comments Off on Season Preview: HoopsHD interviews Walt Williams about new Coppin State head coach Juan Dixon

The Hoops HD Report: August Session with Bryan Black

Bryan Black (@350jerseys4hope) joins Chad, David, and Jon to discuss his experiences with epilepsy and his efforts to raise awareness by collecting jerseys from all 351 div1 programs.  Watch and/or listen as he shares his incredible story and discusses some of the interactions he’s had with teams as he’s worked toward amassing all the jerseys.

 

And for all you radio lovers, below is an mp3 version of the show….

Posted in Hoops HD Report, Podcasts, Videocasts | Comments Off on The Hoops HD Report: August Session with Bryan Black

Spiraling Salaries: HoopsHD interviews Robert Lattinville and Roger Denny

Times might be tough for a lot of people in America…but not if you are a D-1 men’s basketball coach. A 2014 study by the American Association of University Professors found that the median compensation for men’s head basketball coaches at D-1 schools increased by a whopping 102% during a 6-year stretch from 2005-2011. This is based on a variety of factors (including NCAA Tournament broadcasting rights) and has had a number of corresponding effects (such as some assistant coach salaries that are starting to approach $1 million). HoopsHD’s Jon Teitel recently got to speak with Robert Lattinville and Roger Denny (attorneys from Spencer Fane LLP who have conducted some fascinating research into this topic) to get their thoughts on what caused this trend and whether it is sustainable.

  

According to a USA Today article last spring, Louisville’s Rick Pitino was the highest paid head coach last season with $7,769,200…but then he got suspended for 5 games earlier this summer for allegedly failing to monitor his program during an alleged sex-for-pay scandal: should any college coach be making that much money, and what impact do you think his salary had on his punishment (if any)?  As sports lawyers we do not believe that we are qualified to say whether a basketball coach of any level of skill/accomplishment should be paid exponentially more than a brain surgeon, cancer researcher, or 2nd-grade teacher. To be sure, among the ranks of college coaches their skills/accomplishments range from those of glorified gym teachers to CEOs of multi-million dollar enterprises with broad and unique skills applied in continuous high-pressure high-profile activities. For all of the other things it is or purports to be, we view college athletics as a premier sector of the entertainment industry. Properly considered with respect to the current market for that industry sector, the highest-salaried college coaches are paid within the realistic bounds of that market. We do not view the issue as a matter of scale (i.e., coaches pay vs. pay for other professions): we view it as 1 of relative scale in a top-down auction market. In that market, the case can be made that Coach Pitino is fairly compensated relative to his peers (for which there are few that are similarly qualified). To that end, note that the total amount includes a $750,000 bonus in the current year: in the absence of that bonus, Kentucky coach John Calipari would have been the highest paid men’s basketball coach this season.

Each of the top-5 salaried coaches on the list (Pitino/Calipari/Mike Krzyzewski/Bill Self/Tom Izzo) make more than $4 million/year and have won a national title: if a coach has a history of getting his team into postseason play and winning titles, are those good enough reasons to pay him a lot of money?  Participation in the postseason certainly drives an economic benefit to the university (http://www.forbes.com/sites/chrissmith/2014/03/20/how-a-single-ncaa-tournament-win-is-worth-1-6-million/#63a53d8332b0) and consistent participation and success magnifies that benefit, perhaps exponentially. If there are other activities in which the coach engages that discount/detract from the value of such performance, the university should estimate and contract for the appropriate discount, which includes the termination of such employment for cause.

The total pay for these coaches includes many elements beyond their base salary (such as retention payments, deferred compensation, money from shoe/clothing/apparel companies, advancing in the NCAA tourney, multi-media deals, running summer camps, speaking fees, etc.) as well as all kinds of perks (private jets, housing allowances, severance packages, etc.): do you think these are all reasonable extras or do you think that a coach who makes a 7-figure salary should be expected to make it to the Sweet 16 and/or pay for his own house?  Many of those perks and added benefits were borne from thoughtful tax planning on behalf of universities and coaches’ counsel. Unfortunately, these perks have now become expected by many, leaving the industry to continue to find new ways to create value (life insurance being the most popular of the current trends). As a threshold matter, the competitive nature of the business (win or be fired) should compel a consistent, maximum effort from coaches. The bonuses/extras should be better structured to reward performance that exceeds current the coach’s current annual guaranteed compensation.

According to some of your own research, Louisville’s Kenny Payne was the highest-paid assistant coach in the nation last season with $805,000 but the Cardinals’ entire staff compensation as a percentage of program revenue was the cheapest in the nation at 2.71% (Rutgers was the highest at 13.01%): if a school has a huge athletic department budget, then should they just be allowed to spend all that money on salaries or whatever else they desire?  Should they be “allowed to”? Yes, certainly (unless and until the market is disrupted in a meaningful way). However, I think the universities that already are/are becoming the standard-bearers in D-1 are more intently focused on measuring ROI (return on investment) and finding the most efficient uses of their revenue. In most years, the single-most important determinate of economic success in a collegiate athletic department is competitive success, which is driven by recruiting/developing high performing student-athletes. Unlike the sport of football where a player must wait until 3 years after his high school class graduates to enter the NFL Draft, basketball players become NBA draft-eligible at age 19 (assuming a few other qualifying factors). Since “1-and-done” players are typically the most talented ones in college basketball, the emphasis on recruiting this kind of player is logical. In most instances, a university’s most productive means of recruiting talented players is by hiring/retaining coaches who are effective recruiters.

Kentucky had the highest average assistant coach salary in the nation last year at $562,333 (which is more than the $521,000 former UNC-Wilmington head coach Kevin Keatts made last season after winning his 3rd straight CAA title): do you think that there are guys who would prefer to be an assistant rather than the head man as long as they are making the same amount of money?  All things being equal, few coaches would rather be an assistant. High-level college basketball hiring is a bit unique in that high-major head coaching jobs rarely go to assistant coaches. The likely effect of rising assistant coach pay is that high-paid assistants become more choosy about the head coaching jobs that they will consider, recognizing that accepting such a position may also be accompanied by a pay cut. This may limit the market for qualified head coach candidates.

NC State had the most experienced staff in the nation last season with 82 years of aggregate experience yet missed the NCAA tourney, while Florida had 1 of the least experienced staffs with only 25 years aggregate experience yet made it all the way to the Elite 8: what kind of correlation is there between an experienced staff and on-court success (if any)?  As coaches like to say, “It is not about the Xs and Os: it is about the Johnnys and the Joes!” It is very difficult to normalize the on-court performance of coaching staffs because disparity in talent is such a critical factor. Moreover, the varying role of the head coach is also a factor that challenges an appropriate regression analysis. I think that experience has somewhat of a decreasing utility: previously, additional experience meant extra time on the recruiting trail, more connections to high-school and club team coaches, greater evaluation of competition, etc. As with most everything else, technology and increased exposure for recruits has leveled the playing field such that lesser-experienced coaches are able to quickly gather, process, and use the available information and contacts.

Oregon State was the most expensive program last year at $141,543.20/win while Purdue was the least expensive at $20,799.26/win: do you think that Boilermakers coach Matt Painter deserves a nice raise after making the NCAA tourney in 9 of the past 11 seasons without charging his school a fortune?  As relates to Coach Painter, I think there are 3 distinct circumstances worth mentioning: (1) Coach Painter signed an 8-year deal in 2011 (which was amended in 2016 to add 3 more seasons), a deal that was then, and would be now, for a longer term than what is customary; (2) he was on the proverbial “hot seat” as recently as 2015; and (3) there has been substantial turnover in the period since he  signed that deal. The longer term buoyed Coach Painter during the time when Purdue was “down” (they did not win a single NCAA tourney game during a 4-year stretch from 2013-2016), and it remains above the Big 10 median…but I would expect an amendment to be forthcoming.

1 of the emerging trends you discovered was that many assistant coach contracts now include provisions that tie the length of their employment to the tenure of their head coach: why is this a new thing, and do you think it is a good or bad idea?  I think it is a smart strategy: the circumstances are extraordinarily rare for a new coach to retain his new school’s existing staff. Tying the assistant coaches’ contracts to the head coach’s contract can accomplish, at least, the following: (1) more thoughtful hiring decisions by the head coach, and (2) cost savings if the head coach departs on his own volition or as a result of a university termination with or without cause.

Some of the biggest factors that increase a school’s bottom line are alumni boosters/season ticket sales/licensing revenue: if programs like Duke/Kentucky bring in more than $20 million/year in revenue and/or have rich alumni who support their program, is that a good reason to pay their coaches a lot of money?  The evidence suggests that coaching is a primary driver of success and success is a primary driver of revenue. As mentioned above, unless and until there is disruption in the amateurism model, attracting and retaining elite coaches will be a smart use of available resources. Perhaps the most clear demonstration of this is at Michigan, where the athletic department experienced somewhat of an economic renaissance from the hiring of head football coach Jim Harbaugh after the 2014 season (www.mlive.com/wolverines/index.ssf/2015/09/tickets_sales_up_revenue_on_th.html).

I think it is safe to assume that star coaches often attract the best players (thanks to lavish stadiums/other amenities/a proven track record of helping players make it into professional leagues): what do you think that recruits care about the most, and does a coach deserve a bonus for being a great recruiter even if it does not translate to on-court success? The answers are different in football and basketball. In football, the athlete is going to be on campus for a minimum of 3 years, so providing the best available experience (in terms of resources and the quality of the facilities in which they spend the vast majority of their time) for that 3-year period is a key recruiting advantage. In basketball, the 1-and-done rule has forced recruits to evaluate their college choice based upon their belief of which coach/program can best amplify their exposure to the decision-makers at the next level. Often, the exposure follows the coaches in college basketball.  However, we do not believe that recruiting should be separated form performance for bonus purposes. Universities previously rewarded coaches with bonuses if they had a high recruiting class ranking. However, there has been a trend away from that practice as universities recognize that such rankings can be somewhat arbitrary and individual talent is no guarantee of team success (note that the #1 pick in each of the last 2 NBA drafts came from a team that did not qualify for the NCAA tournament: Ben Simmons of LSU and Markelle Fultz of Washington).

The popularity of March Madness seems to always be on the rise (Americans spend a collective 650 million+ hours/year watching the NCAA tourney on various screens, and there are estimates that companies lose almost $2 billion in wages while people fill out brackets and track the results): is it too simplistic to say that coaches deserve to get paid more when CBS/Turner are paying the NCAA more than $1 billion/year for the broadcast rights?  Coaches seem to be the most-marketable commodity in college basketball, so I understand the argument for allowing them a greater share of the revenue. However, I think that prudent athletic directors are intently focused on the shifting grounds for media rights and will fight the urge to make spending decisions based upon those TV deals.

Is there any correlation between having a winning program and enrolling better students or securing more funding for academics, and if not then is it worth paying a high salary to a coach even if he is a consistent winner? There is empirical evidence to support the “front-porch” theory of collegiate athletics: applications and interest in institutions certainly increase when an institution succeeds athletically, especially in the revenue sports (www.cnbc.com/2016/04/08/march-madness-win-brings-college-admissions-windfall.html).

Some schools charge their students an “athletic fee” that are as much as $1000/student: do you like this policy, and what are the right/wrong uses for such a big pot of money?  It depends on what the fee covers. If it entitles the student to admission at games or other tangible benefits, then it may make sense. If it is merely a tax for a specific project (as is often the case), then we believe there to be more palatable funding opportunities available to well-run athletic departments.

Have we reached a point of no return when it comes to escalating salaries, and if not then what can schools do to stop it without the risk of being charged with collusion or a violation of federal antitrust law?  Perhaps we have reached a point of return as to the nominal amount of compensation payable, but we see a shifting trend in which athletic directors are retrenching and becoming more thoughtful about structure (especially as relates to deferred compensation/bonuses). As the approach to incentives becomes more thoughtful, we will see a better alignment of coaching contracts and less turnover (noting that shortened tenure is perhaps the single biggest factor in rising salaries: www.spencerfane.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Sample-Analysis-2016.pdf).

According to a Washington Post review of financial records, rising administrative/support staff salaries are some of the biggest reasons that otherwise profitable or self-sufficient athletic departments have deficits (in a 10-year span the non-coaching payrolls at the combined athletic departments of 48 schools in the 5 wealthiest college conferences rose 69% from $454 million to $767 million): what caused such a spike, and why on earth would a school pay all these other salaries if it causes them to lose money? In prior years schools paid these amounts because there was little fiscal accountability: revenue (especially among the Power 5 conferences) was assumed to grow at a rate beyond expenses. However, the emerging issues facing collegiate athletic directors require skills/experience never before required to operate their departments effectively. Budget deficits should spawn athletic department restructuring, including hiring outside counsel and consultants to bridge the learning curve and/or maintain economies available from purchasing the expertise needed to successfully navigate one-time and evolving industry disruptors.

According to an ESPN article last March, not a single governor was a state’s highest-paid public employee in 2016, and when you add up all 50 governor salaries it is still less than what the coaches from the 3 public schools who made the Final 4 (Oregon coach Dana Altman/South Carolina coach Frank Martin/Kansas coach Roy Williams) received in base pay: so is the moral of the story that you should tell your kids to become a coach rather than a governor when they grow up?!  From a compensation perspective it certainly pays to focus on prosperous industries. For better or worse, the business of politics seems to attract individuals who have their own income or generate it from other sources.

Posted in News and Notes | Tagged , | Comments Off on Spiraling Salaries: HoopsHD interviews Robert Lattinville and Roger Denny

The Hoops HD Report: July Session

We have a full panel this month as we look at the changes the committee has decided to make to the NCAA Team sheets and how winning on the road should become more of an emphasis in the upcoming year.  We also take a quick look at the ongoing TBT Tournament, talk a little bit about the U-19 World Championships where Team USA came up short, discuss some recruiting in the SEC, and more….

 

And for all you radio lovers, below is an mp3 version of the show….

Posted in Hoops HD Report, Podcasts, Videocasts | Comments Off on The Hoops HD Report: July Session