Pac 12 vs Grand Canyon – The For-Profit Controversy

The Grand Canyon University Antelopes begin their transition to full Division I membership this season, as they will become a member of the “new look” WAC.  Grand Canyon has one unique feature to its school that is not, on paper at least, possessed by any other Division I school.  Grand Canyon is a “for profit” university.  This means the school sells its shares and seek investors, and in theory would pay dividends based on its yearly earnings.  As a for profit entity, Grand Canyon does not received the same tax-exempt status that every other Division I school has.

 
It has been reported that other Division I schools are not very keen on a for profit university joining Division I.  Cbssports.com’s Dennis Dodd reported that the Pac-12 is in the process of filing a formal protest of their admission and is urging its member school not to schedule any games against Grand Canyon in any sports.  Quite frankly, in my opinion, this is one of the most ridiculous and hypocritical things I have ever heard of.

 
Like it or not, we live in an era where college sports is being driven by one major guiding force.  That force, of course, is the almighty dollar.  Conferences are signing television deals and creating their own networks in order to bring millions if not billions of dollars into their universities.  The dollars being paid out by cable and satellite providers to carry more and more collegiate sports is getting practically insane, and that money is filtering through to the universities.  ESPN has about 500 channels, FOX with the introduction this year of their new Fox Sports networks is not far behind, NBC and CBS have their own sports channels, and then we have the individual conference networks, such as the Big Ten Network, Pac 12 Network, and in 2014 the SEC Network.  And that doesn’t even bring up Texas’ Longhorn Network.

 
These Division I schools are receiving millions of dollar each year, but claim they are non-profit entities.  They pour the money into supporting their non-revenue earning sports like water polo and badminton and curling or whatever else they offer.  They pour money from athletics, in theory, back into their schools to go towards research and financial aid and all those other lofty goals.  And what else do they do with the money?  Oh yeah, they solicit “boosters” to give the school more money–and then reward these people with the best seats at the games or fancy dinners with the school president or the like.  And by the way, each school’s regents/directors certainly checks the bottom line each year to make sure that enough revenue is coming in from the sports that earn money in order to balance the books.

 
Grand Canyon, as an alternative way of doing business, has decided to solicit “investors” (boosters?) and is attempting to make enough money to support its athletic programs, research, and financial aid.  It gives dividends (rewards) to its investors in exchange for the money they invest in it.  Its university officials review the bottom line each year to make sure the school is not losing money.  In other words, it runs the exact same way that every other school in the country runs, it just uses different terms!

 
Actually, that is not quite true.  Grand Canyon does do one major thing that the rest of Division I does not do.  It pays taxes.  It’s revenues not only pay for seats with cup holders and built in massagers for its biggest “investors,” but they also go to help pay for all those government funded programs, like..oh..say..disaster relief for victims of Hurricane Sandy.

 
If the Pac-12 wants to keep Grand Canyon out of Division I, it should first take a good hard look at itself in the mirror.  Grand Canyon is making money the American way, building a profitable business and paying taxes on its profits.  The Pac-12 and the rest of Division I are making money as well — they are just exploiting the system, avoiding taxes, and even accepting tax dollars from the government — tax dollars paid by Grand Canyon, by you, and by me.

 
And now I’m going to see my stockbroker about buying a few shares of the Antelopes.

Posted in News and Notes | Comments Off on Pac 12 vs Grand Canyon – The For-Profit Controversy

Bracket Racket 07.04.13

Brad Stevens to Boston? That’s cause enough for an emergency podcast, as we hurriedly got the band back together at the dawn of Independence Day, and discussed the ramifications of the boy wonder heading to the big scary NBA. We also talked about the culture change that NBA front offices appear to be going through, as well as the long-term prognosis for the Butler program.

Posted in Podcasts | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Bracket Racket 07.04.13

I Think Butler Is Fine

Here is an assessment of the changes Butler has undergone, and how the general consensus/main stream media reacted to it.

06-07 – Butler begins the season predicted to finish 6th in the Horizon League. They make the Sweet Sixteen after being in the rankings all year and come very close to beating Florida, who was in the process of winning their second straight title.

After that season, Lickliter leaves for Iowa. People say Butler is done. They end up hiring someone no one has ever heard of to the point to where he was mistaken as a player in street clothes early on.

 

07-08 – Butler has low expectations, but has another big year under first year coach Brad Stevens. They finish in the rankings, make the NCAAs, and lose in overtime to Tennessee in the round of 32. The general consensus is that the first year coach did it with Lickliter’s players, and now that they’re gone Butler is done.

 

08-09 – Butler is again picked to finish in the middle of the HL after the loss of Lickliter’s players. Again, they play their way into the rankings, finish first in the conference and make the NCAA Tournament.

 

09-10 – Butler returns pretty much everyone from the previous year, and people are finally catching on that perhaps they’re not done after all. It took three years for people to realize it, but they began in the top 25, stayed there all year, and ended up as national runner ups.

 

10-11 – Butler has high expecations but struggles during the year. Throughout the entire year, whenever Butler is playing, references are made how they had one great run but have not been able to sustain that success and were basically a flash in the pan. Most people forget that they weren’t even being picked to make the NCAAs at the beginning of March that season. They win the Horizon League Tournament, make the NCAAs, and are once again the national runner up.

 

11-12 – Butler is not expected to be good, and does even worse than their expectations. People again think they’re done.

 

12-13 – Butler begins the season unranked. Everyone is saying they’ll sink in the Atlantic Ten, especially after the poor season they had the previous year. They ended up playing their way into the rankings, making the NCAAs, and losing in the round of 32.  Not great, but not bad either.

 

Summer 2013 – Stevens leaves. The general consensus once again is that Butler is done. The most recent death blow in a long line of death blows that were not death blows.

 

Okay, when I look at that, I see that the frequent general consensus is that Butler is always done, and every time it’s wrong. They were done when Collier left. They were done when Matta left and won with Collier’s players. They were done when Lickliter left. They were done several times under the Steven’s regime.

Do I think they’ll make the title game in back to back years anytime soon?? No.

Do I think they’re done?? No. I think they’ll remain a top 25 caliber program and be in the rankings more often than not. The same people that are saying Stevens was Butler are the same ones that were saying he would never do well. I was with the consensus before, and like the consensus I was wrong. I’m not with them this time. Maybe the consensus will be right this time, but I doubt it. I don’t think Butler will disappear.

 

Griggs

Posted in News and Notes | Tagged , | Comments Off on I Think Butler Is Fine

(Way) Too Early Consensus Top-25

Like a jockey trying to navigate his thoroughbred out of the starting gate, the mainstream media was in a rush late Monday night to disclose their wildly varied early rankings for the 2013-14 college basketball season. Instead of trying to assemble our own subjective, inconsistent rankings, we decided we’d simply piggyback off the work of others and put together a consensus of those rankings.

Below is an admittedly rudimentary conglomeration of 10 separate top-25 rankings for next season, which are not terribly consistent in expectations. Since the NCAA’s declaration deadline for the NBA draft has not yet arrived, there’s no consensus as to which players will be returning that haven’t yet decided. Thus, rankings are all over the place.

Nonetheless, we’ve taken those 10 polls and given 25 points for first place, 24 points for second and so on. Each team’s best and worst ranking has been thrown out to account, somewhat, for the wild fluctuation from poll-to-poll.

To no one’s surprise, Kentucky was the unanimous pick for the No. 1-team in the country. After that, there’s not a ton of consensus. Louisville comes out second, but Russ Smith has since thrown his hat in the NBA ring for next season, which means their spot is tenuous at best.

Behold, the way, way too early consensus top-25 for next season…

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Asjb5kvZz0PcdFJVaUJ1TW0xSS00WHN3TXluTjljTGc&usp=sharing

Posted in Daily Rundown | Comments Off on (Way) Too Early Consensus Top-25

CIT Game of the Day – Championship Edition, April 2, 2013

The CIT comes to a conclusion tonight at 8:00 PM Eastern as the East Carolina Pirates travel to Ogden, Utah to take on the Weber State Wildcats in the championship game.  The game will be televised live on CBS Sports Network.

East Carolina finished tied for fourth in Conference USA this season, and was 18-12 after Tulsa knocked them out in the CUSA quarterfinals.  They pulled out a 1 point come from behind victory over Savannah State in the CIT first round before cruising through to the finals, beating Rider by 21, Loyola by 11, and Evansville by 13.  Their top players this tournament have been Maurice Kemp and Robert Sampson, with Kemp being the team’s top scoring threats, having posted at least 20 points in eight straight games.

Weber State finished one game behind Montana in the Big Sky standings, and fell to the Grizzlies in the Big Sky title game, sending them to the CIT.  They entered this tournament with 26 wins, and now stand at an eye-popping 30-6 entering tonight’s championship game.  The Wildcats cruised through the first three rounds of the CIT, beating Cal Poly by 42, Air Force by 21, and Oral Roberts by 9.  Their semifinal against Northern Iowa proved to be the great game that was predicted, with Weber State able to pull out a 59-56 victory in a game that came right down to the wire.  Weber State has a balanced scoring attack and leads the nation in field goal shooting percentage.  They showed just how complete of a team they are in their semifinal win over UNI when they were held to just 39% shooting but still found a way to pull out the victory.

Tonight’s winner will be the first of four Division I Men’s Basketball championships awarded this season, with the CBI title to be decided either Wednesday or Friday, the NIT champion to be crowned on Thursday, and the National Championship to be decided next Monday night.  However, the CIT title game does mark the end of our featured Small Conference games this season.  Don’t worry though — the start of the 2013-14 season is less than seven months away!

Posted in News and Notes | Comments Off on CIT Game of the Day – Championship Edition, April 2, 2013

CIT Game of the Day – March 30, 2013

Two of the spots in the NCAA Final Four will be determined today.  However, those are not the only two Division I men’s basketball games on the schedule.  In addition to the two Regional Finals,  the CIT semifinals will be played today to determine the teams that will meet Tuesday night in the championship game.  Today’s schedule (all times Eastern) is:

Evansville (21-14) @  East Carolina (21-12) 5:00 pm
Weber State (29-6) @  Northern Iowa (21-14) 8:00 pm

Both games will be streamed live at watchcollegeinsider.com.

While the first game on the slate presents an interesting match-up of teams that had somewhat mediocre regular seasons before putting together a run to this round of the CIT, it is the later of the two games that is clearly our featured game of the day.  Weber State and Northern Iowa were, on paper, probably the two favorites to take the CIT title this season, anf the winner will clearly be the favorite to cut down the nets as champion.

Weber State sits at 29 wins on the season and has a chance to reach the elite level of 30 victories tonight.  They were clearly the second best team in the Big Sky this season behind Montana, and but for a bad loss in conference play to Montana State, might have had a chance to host the conference tournament which could have resulted in a different NCAA tournament representative out of the Big Sky.

Northern Iowa was solid all season in the Missouri Valley Conference, picking up a win over Wichita State on the way and playing at times like a potential NCAA tournament team.  They have already eliminated conference-mate Bradley, Illinois-Chicago and North Dakota in this tournament, all by fairly easy margins.  However, Weber State has been even more decisive in their CIT victories, including a 42 point blowout of Cal Poly in the first round.  While tonight’s game is far from the most important college basketball game to be played today, it may very well end up being the most exciting.

Posted in News and Notes | Comments Off on CIT Game of the Day – March 30, 2013