Happy Tourney-versary!: HoopsHD interviews former South Dakota star Turner Trofholz

With the 2020 NCAA tourney tipping off next month, we will spend this month taking a walk down memory lane with a choice collection of players/coaches who are celebrating an awesome anniversary this year. From some game-winning FTs in the 1955 tourney (65th anniversary) through a 17-PT comeback win in the 2015 1st 4 (5th anniversary), these legends have all carved out a little piece of history in past Marches. We continue our series with Turner Trofholz, who scored 42 PTS in a D-2 tourney game in 2005. He was a 2-time All-American/2-time Academic All-American, the 2006 national co-POY, and still has the best FG% in school history. HoopsHD’s Jon Teitel got to chat with Turner about the 15th anniversary of his great performance in the 2005 tourney and his decision to become a coach.

You grew up in Nebraska: what made you choose South Dakota? First: the people who recruited me. When I was in high school we had a home visit and the 2 people who came into Schuyler were Andy Markowski/Dave Boots. I knew Coach Markowski from watching him play high school basketball at Ord/college basketball at Nebraska. I really liked Coach Boots and everything that he had to say. Second: the dome. When I went up for my visit the dome sold me: it was a great place to play!

In the 2005 D-2 tourney you scored a career-high 42 PTS/16-20 FG in a 10-PT win over Nebraska-Kearney: was it just 1 of those scenarios where every shot you put up seemed to go in because you were “in the zone”? I really did not take a shot from outside 5 feet! UNK pressed our guards all game long but we broke the press and I got to shoot layups most of the time. We had a really close group of guards who worked well together. Josh Mueller/Luke Tibbetts/Dave Nour were all really good at handling the ball.

In 2006 you were named D-2 co-national POY: what did it mean to you to receive such an outstanding honor? Being in Indianapolis to receive the award in front of all the D-1 coaches/players who were receiving their own awards was the best part. That was the year that JJ Redick/Adam Morrison split the D-1 national POY award. As a huge Duke fan it was humbling for me to meet Redick as well as Sheldon Williams (the national DPOY).

You were a 2-time All-American/2-time Academic All-American: how did you balance your work on the court with your work in the classroom? I left basketball on the basketball court and left classwork in the classroom. I think it is important to understand that when you are playing basketball you need to focus on that, and when you are in class you need to focus on that. It was not always easy being gone from class during road trips. As long as you communicated and worked hard to get things turned in as soon as possible, the professors were usually pretty good about working with you. They did not cut you much slack but they were very understanding about when you were away from campus.

You remain in the top-3 in school history in both PTS/REB: how did you balance your scoring with your rebounding? A lot of my scoring came from my rebounding. I was only looking at 1 stat on the stat sheet: how many offensive rebounds I had. If teams are focusing on you when you are on offense then you can always go to the glass and get offensive boards. I think that I led the league in offensive rebounds during my senior year, which was 1 of my ultimate goals. You can provide yourself/your teammates that extra possession you may need to win a game.

Your 61.9 FG% is still #1 in school history: what is the key to being a great shooter? It was an advantage of playing the post and not having to shoot far away from the basket. I think the biggest thing for me was my footwork. I knew that I was not the biggest post in the league so I had to find ways to get around people. Footwork was important and allowed me to create separation in the post and turn a difficult shot into a much easier shot.

After graduating you played professionally in Austria/Holland: what is the biggest difference between basketball in the US vs. basketball overseas? There is not a huge difference: just some slight differences in the rules, stuff that you get used to right away. In Austria it was interesting to play with a language barrier. Some players and even 1 of my assistant coaches did not speak much English: THAT part was tough to get used to!

In 2016 you were named to the school’s Hall of Fame: where does that rank among the highlights of your career? It is up there as 1 of the greatest. If you play a sport and do not want to be remembered as 1 of the greatest of all time, then why play the sport?! You need to have a competitive drive at all times since that will make you better than the person you are playing against.

You are currently a girls’ high school basketball coach: how do you like the job, and what do you hope to do in the future? I am currently a girls’ coach after I was a head boys’ coach for 4 years. I would like to eventually get back to the boys’ side of things: girls’ basketball is definitely a different game. I could also see myself getting into the college game if the right opportunity comes along. Even if that does not happen, coaching will always be a passion of mine. Maybe somewhere down the line I will become an athletic director since I finished my masters in administration.

When people look back on your career, how do you want to be remembered the most? I would like to be remembered as a good teammate and someone who people liked playing basketball with and was coachable. Everything else does not really matter unless coaches wanted to coach you and players enjoyed playing with you.

Posted in Interviews | Tagged , | Comments Off on Happy Tourney-versary!: HoopsHD interviews former South Dakota star Turner Trofholz

Bracket Projections (from David Griggs):

For Today’s News, Notes, and Highlighted Games – CLICK HERE

For John Stalica’s UTR Game(s) of the Day – CLICK HERE

This bracket considers all games played through Sunday, February 23rd.

This is NOT an attempt to guess what the actual Selection Committee will do on Selection Sunday, nor it is a supposition of what they would do if today were Selection Sunday.  This is entirely my own, and depicts the way I personally think the field should look like.  For all the committee members that may see this, it is my pleasure to educate you on what you need to be doing!!

Below the bracket are some notes where I explain why I did some of the things I did.  Below that are comments from some of the rest of the Hoops HD Staff.  If they disagree with anything that I have done, then THEY ARE WRONG!!!

 

OTHERS CONSIDERED: Saint Mary’s, UNC Greensboro, Cincinnati, Rutgers, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Purdue, Memphis, Rhode Island, Alabama, Texas, Stanford, Notre Dame, Tulsa

NOTES FROM DAVID

-I’ll start on the #1 line with San Diego State being ahead of Gonzaga.  I know Gonzaga lost at BYU, and San Diego State lost to a much worse UNLV team.  But, you have to look at the whole season.  San Diego State won at BYU, and to date is the only team that has.  They also have a neutral floor win against a Creighton team that I think is fantastically good.  The top of SDSU’s resume is better than the top of Gonzaga’s, and even though SDSU has a poorer loss, it’s also against a team that they managed to beat on the road earlier in the year.  I’m not saying that you should not consider the loss, but what I am saying is that upon consideration, I personally like a San Diego State team with better wins who has redeemed their one and only loss over Gonzaga and their current resume.

-I know many people are putting Dayton on the #2 line.  I know the actual committee put them on the #2 line a couple weeks ago, and will likely do so on Selection Sunday.  If I were guessing the committee, I’d put them on the #2 line, but I’m not.  I like this Dayton team a lot, but I just can’t get them that high on my seedlist when they have no wins against anyone in the top half of my bracket.  So, while a #3 seed may seem too low based on where they are ranked in the polls, I don’t think I’m being unfair to them when you consider that they are the only team on my top SEVEN lines that has not beaten anyone in the top half of the bracket.

-I have three Big East teams on the #2 line.  The Big East is the #1 overall conference in the NET, and while I know that isn’t a factor, Creighton played 5 out of conference games against teams that are either in this bracket or under consideration.  Villanova and Seton Hall each played 4.  So they’ve played killer schedules and done very well against them, which is why I think they deserve the seeds that I gave them.  All of them have also beaten protected seeds in true road games (albeit in some cases those wins came against each other) and won multiple games against teams in the top half of the bracket away from home.  While some of the teams on the #3 line have done that as well, I don’t think any of them top out quite as high.

-I do not have Auburn as a protected seed.  While I think they’re good, the only team they’ve beaten away from home that I have in the field is Richmond.  Beating Kentucky at home is a good home win, but I don’t think that in and of itself is as good as the other teams on the top 4 lines.

-Arizona’s NET is undeniably high, but nothing else about them is.  They’ve beaten Colorado at home, which is good, but it’s not top ten good, or even top 25 good.  Colorado is just 4-4 in true road games, and a couple of teams outside the top half of the bracket have also beaten them at home.  They also have a win against Illinois and won at Stanford, and while that’s a good game to win, I still think it’s only #8 seed good, not #5 seed good.  To me, the wins just aren’t there.  Just about everyone I have ahead of them has won games that were harder to win.

-UCLA, Providence, and Georgetown are all in the field.  I do not think the real committee would take any of those teams, and I realize that some of UCLA’s losses, and the overall number of losses for Providence and Georgetown are a hangup.  But with UCLA’s road wins at Arizona and Colorado, Providence’s road wins against Butler and Marquette as well as three others against teams in the top half of the bracket, and Georgetown’s wins at Butler and Creighton (at home) and no bad losses to go along with it, I just think they’ve done WAY more than any of the teams that I didn’t take.

-Saint Mary’s is first team out, or last team out, or next in line, or however you want to phrase it.  I know most people like them a lot more than that, but this is their profile: A home win against BYU who is 5-5 on the road with the only notable win coming at Houston, neutral floor wins against Wisconsin and Arizona State, which are decent, but also occurred at a time when neither team was playing as well as they are now, and a home win against Utah State who has an overall losing record on the road.  When you consider that in addition to that they have losses to Pacific, Santa Clara, and Winthrop, that looks pretty bubblish to me.

-Lastly, Purdue was considered, but not selected.  If you think they are ineligible because they are not above .500, you are wrong.  That rule changed years ago (not that it matters), so don’t tweet at me telling me that I don’t know that rule, because if you do then it is you who does not know that rule!!

STAFF COMMENTS

COMMENTS FROM JOHN:

– Personally, I thought the loss by San Diego State was a blessing in disguise – they probably weren’t going to pass Gonzaga for #1 in the West, but would still likely be at worst #5 overall and thus would be in the catbird’s seat to go to the West Regional in nearby Los Angeles anyhow. Yet Gonzaga had their own slipup at BYU, so a case could be made that San Diego State should be #3 overall. Now if Gonzaga does win the WCC Tournament championship, they would likely beat either BYU or Saint Mary’s in the championship along the way. It’s a harder road for them than what SDSU will have left in Vegas in a couple of weeks.

– I think the Big East has been a tough conference this year, but I think it would take a perfect storm for 3 #2 seeds AND eight overall teams into the field. I’d actually agree with Providence in the field given that their good things are outweighing 4 real ugly losses, but I think Georgetown’s roster of paper clips and rubber bands (in the words of Teitel) is starting to catch up with them. They could not afford a DePaul loss, and they really need to beat Xavier at home next weekend along with stealing a win elsewhere before conference play wraps up.

– I know the season doesn’t end today, but has a team ever been seeded as high as #5 with either a losing record or .500 in conference play? We could be looking at a historical mark with Butler here. I did notice that West Virginia is much lower than what we’ve had them, although three of their conference losses can be excused as Baylor and Kansas. When K-State and TCU account for two of those losses, that’s harder to justify.

– I was set to put Colorado in as a protected seed myself, but losing to UCLA twice in the season is going to offset that for me for the time being. We really do live in a parallel universe where six Pac-12 teams are selected, yet Arizona State is the one that is currently leading the conference. To say that the road trip by the Arizona schools to the LA schools this week is huge would be an understatement.

– For teams under the radar, I think an 11 would be the ceiling for Northern Iowa. I would rank them above the First Four if they win out, although I honestly might not be able to make a case for an at-large if they take on one more loss the rest of the way. As the Puppet would say, losing to the Trees might have been their last strike. East Tennessee State has a little more leeway to take on one more loss as long as it were to come against either UNC-Greensboro or Furman in the SoCon championship game.

COMMENTS FROM CHAD:

– I read David’s comments in which he discussed how wins over Creighton, BYU, Utah State and Iowa are better than wins over Arizona, BYU, Oregon and St Mary’s.  I read him claim that we should almost ignore San Diego State’s home loss to UNLV because they won in Vegas earlier, but should not ignore Gonzaga’s road loss at BYU despite the Zags having beaten BYU by 23 points at home earlier this year.  I read them.  They make ZERO sense, but I read them.  The Zags are clearly #3 overall and should get the West Regional 1 seed.  Case closed.

– Dayton is one of two teams undefeated in their conference (along with New Mexico State) and has won 16 games in a row.  They have ROAD wins at Richmond VCU, Saint Louis and Duquesne, all very tough places to win on the road.  Sure, they have not beaten a protected seed team this year, but both the Kansas and Colorado games came right down to the wire.  Not only would I have them on my 2 line, I could now see a case for a #1 seed if San Diego State slips up again and  the Flyers win out the rest of the season (which would include a road win at Rhode Island and an A-10 tourney title).

– I agree with Stalica about Colorado being over-seeded after suffering another home loss.  I would probably have Oregon in that spot after their win at Arizona.  I do see the case for Auburn as a 4 seed as well, but I can actually live with them on the 5 or 6 line for the reasons David spelled out  (I really HATE agreeing with him sometimes).  The same goes for Arizona, whom David has lower than I would, but I at least understand the argument.

– David did a good job putting an 18-9 team from the State of Michigan on the 4 line.  He just put the wrong one there.  The Michigan Wolverines have won 5 in a row, have SEVEN Tier 1 wins, four of which are away from home, and only one loss to a team not in the field (at Minnesota).  The Spartans only have five Tier 1 wins, three of which are away from home.  I think the bad on both profiles is almost dead even, and the good on Michigan’s side is way better.  The two teams should be flipped in the bracket.

– Butler is a perplexing team to me.  At one point, this team was playing like a protected seed.  Recently, they seem to be playing more like an NIT team.  The profile probably screams 5 or 6 seed at the moment, but my personal “eye test” from the last couple of weeks would knock the Bulldogs down to a 7 or 8.  Their next two games are home to DePaul and St. John’s.  If they cannot sweep this pair of games, the profile may start to catch up with my views.

– I know David has a massive Puppet-crush on Mick Cronin, and I think a case can be made for UCLA to be in this field,, but a 10 seed is ridiculous.  I would have the Bruins among my top few teams out right now, and they are definitely trending in the right direction.  I guess David likes to ignore winning streaks when they are massively long (see Dayton) but totally jump on a 5 game streak that includes wins at Arizona and Colorado — two places that have not been that hard to win at this season.  You cannot ignore losses to Washington State, Notre Dame, Hofstra and Cal State-Fullerton.  The Bruins, if in, should be in the First Four in Dayton.

– Saint Mary’s should be in.  Oklahoma should be in.  Rhode Island should probably be in.  Rutgers should be in (albeit probably on their way to Dayton).  I can live with Georgetown and/or UCLA in the field (they would in fact be my top two teams out) and I actually agree with Providence being in at the moment.  Mississippi State and South Carolina should be in the NIT.  Miss State won at Florida and has four losses to teams that would not even be considered for at-large bids.  South Carolina did better with wins over Kentucky and Virginia, but also has four losses to teams not on the board, including homes losses to Boston U and Stetson.  I think both teams have a path to an at-large bid, but have a lot of work to get there.  Oklahoma, on the other hand, does not have any real head-scratching losses and has wins over West Virginia, Minnesota, and Mississippi State.  The Sooners three game losing streak does not help, and their next two being against Texas tech and at West Virginia may push them out, but for today they should be in.

– I know David hates Saint Mary’s profile.  That is because he is a #StupidPuppet.  The Gaels beat BYU, Wisconsin, Arizona State and Utah State, with two of those four wins coming away from home.  David has given at-large bids to mediocre power conference teams with 1-2 wins against the field rather than a 23 win WCC team with 4 wins against the field.  Billy Packer would be proud of him.  I, personally, am disgusted.

Posted in Bracketology, News and Notes | Comments Off on Bracket Projections (from David Griggs):

News, Notes, and Highlighted Games: Monday, Feb 24th

NEWS AND NOTES

-For John Stalica’s UTR Game(s) of the Day – CLICK HERE

-Yesterday was a day of (sort of) upsets in the Big Ten.  Ohio State ended Maryland’s winning streak with a 79-72 home win over the Terps.  It really shouldn’t set Maryland back all that much, but I do think it’s another nice step forward for the Buckeyes, who have looked really good when they’re at full strength this year.

-Indiana was blowing out Penn State, then Penn State came back and got the lead, and then Indiana got the lead back and held onto it for a 68-60 win.  The Hoosiers are getting closer and closer to making the NCAA Tournament and should get there if they can hold serve the rest of the way.

-Creighton continues to look very impressive as they just obliterated Butler yesterday 81-59.

-Wichita State really needed a road win against Cincinnati, but didn’t get it.  They are beginning to look very bubblish right now.  Cincinnati is right on the bubble as well.

-Rutgers still can’t win on the road, and I personally think it will ultimately end up costing them a bid.  They fell at Wisconsin yesterday 79-71.

-USC could have done without losing to Utah.  I still think they’re inside the bubble, but not in the top half of the bracket and they need some wins down the stretch in order to feel safe on Selection Sunday.

HIGHLIGHTED GAMES

-LOUISVILLE AT FLORIDA STATE (ACC).  Both teams are close to being locked in as protected seeds, and both can still end up finishing first place in the ACC.  Louisville already has a road win at Duke, and picking this up would give them two massive road wins.

-WEST VIRGINIA AT TEXAS (Big 12).  West Virginia looks like they’ve slid quite a bit.  I still think they’re relatively safe to land in the top half of the bracket, but they don’t look anything like a protected seed to me.  This is a road game that they should be able to win, but it’s also the type of game that they haven’t always won.

-NEBRASKA AT ILLINOIS (Big Ten).  This is perhaps Illinois’s most winnable game that they have remaining.  They should be able to hold serve.

-OKLAHOMA STATE AT KANSAS (Big 12).  There is a good chance that Kansas will be ranked #1 overall later this afternoon.  They have a path to the overall #1 seed if they can keep winning like they have been.

Posted in Daily Rundown, News and Notes | Comments Off on News, Notes, and Highlighted Games: Monday, Feb 24th

Under The Radar Double Feature: Monday, February 24th

Hampton (13-15, 8-7) at Gardner-Webb (12-15, 8-7) – 7:00 PM EST (ESPN+)

Tonight, we give you two games for the price of one for Under The Radar – the first game actually started back on January 20 where Gardner-Webb was leading Hampton 39-31 at halftime. However, this game never progressed beyond halftime since there was a “permanent shot-clock malfunction” at Gardner-Webb that forced the postponement of this Big South contest. All stats from the suspended game will carry over; Josh Perez had 19 points for G-W and Ben Stanley had 16 points for Hampton.

Norfolk State (13-14, 9-3) at Bethune-Cookman (14-13, 8-5) – 7:00 PM EST

Our regularly scheduled UTR Game of the Day gets underway in Daytona Beach where the Bethune-Cookman Wildcats host the Spartans of Norfolk State. The Wildcats have won four out of their last five games and are a very respectable 8-1 at home so far this season; their only home loss so far came against North Carolina Central. Isaiah Bailey (15.4 PPG) and Cletrell Pope (14.1 PPG/11.8 RPG) lead the way for Bethune-Cookman.

Norfolk State won the first meeting between both teams by an 85-72 score back in January; Joe Bryant led the Spartans with 21 points in that game. NSU started conference play 6-0 before leveling off a bit and going 3-3 in their last six contests. Losses to North Carolina A&T and North Carolina Central were hardly unexpected, but a loss to Florida A&M was quite a surprise. The Spartans have the advantage of playing the conference tournament in their hometown at the Scope Arena, but first must navigate a stretch of 3 of 4 games on the road that begins tonight.

Posted in CBB on TV, Daily Rundown, Under the Radar | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Under The Radar Double Feature: Monday, February 24th

Under The Radar Game of the Day: Sunday, February 23rd

For today’s News, Notes and Highlighted Games – CLICK HERE

For Jon Teitel’s latest Bracketology projection – CLICK HERE

Southern Illinois (16-12, 10-5) at Northern Iowa (22-5, 11-4) – 2:00 PM EST (ESPNU)

Today’s UTR Game of the Day takes place in Cedar Falls, Iowa where the Southern Illinois Salukis hit the road to take on the conference leading Northern Iowa Panthers. The Salukis are a game out of first place and have a chance to create a 3-way tie for first place should they be able to pull off an improbable sweep of UNI today. Southern Illinois won the first matchup 68-66 after the Panthers missed a potential game-winning shot in the closing seconds. Aaron Cook leads the Salukis with 15.0 points a game, but watch out for Marcus Domask (14.7 PPG) as well; he is shooting 42.3% from 3-point range this season.

The bad news for Northern Iowa is that they are on a two-game losing streak and are seeing their at-large chances for the NCAA Tournament coming to a near end. The good news for the Panthers is that they are a perfect 14-0 at home this season, and their season wraps up with two home games (including today and their finale against Evansville on Wednesday) and a road game at Drake. At worst, UNI would clinch no worse than a tie for first place in the conference should they win at least two of their final three games. AJ Green (20.2 PPG) is also a sharpshooter from outside range; he is shooting 41% from 3-point range with an average of just over 3 made 3-point shots a game.

Posted in CBB on TV, Daily Rundown, Under the Radar | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Under The Radar Game of the Day: Sunday, February 23rd

Bracketology 2020: March Madness Predictions (Version 8.0)

CLICK HERE for today’s News, Notes, and Highlighted Games

We are only 3 weeks away from Selection Sunday as we continue to make our NCAA tourney predictions. Last March HoopsHD’s Jon Teitel correctly picked 67 of the 68 teams that made the tourney, 63 of which were within 1 spot of their actual seed, including 45 right on the money. He will spend the upcoming weeks predicting which 68 teams will hear their names called on March 15th. See below for his list of who would make the cut if they picked the field today and if you agree or disagree then feel free to tweet us. To see how we stack up with other websites (ranked 7th out of 133 entries over the past 5 years), check out: www.bracketmatrix.com

SEED: TEAM (CONFERENCE)
1: Kansas (Big 12)
1: Baylor (Big 12)
1: Gonzaga (WCC)
1: San Diego State (MWC)

2: Duke (ACC)
2: Dayton (A-10)
2: Maryland (Big 10)
2: Florida State (ACC)

3: Seton Hall (Big East)
3: Louisville (ACC)
3: Creighton (Big East)
3: Villanova (Big East)

4: West Virginia (Big 12)
4: Penn State (Big 10)
4: Kentucky (SEC)
4: Oregon (Pac-12)

5: Colorado (Pac-12)
5: Auburn (SEC)
5: Michigan State (Big 10)
5: Butler (Big East)

6: Arizona (Pac-12)
6: Iowa (Big 10)
6: Marquette (Big East)
6: Ohio State (Big 10)

7: Michigan (Big 10)
7: Houston (AAC)
7: BYU (WCC)
7: Wisconsin (Big 10)

8: Illinois (Big 10)
8: LSU (SEC)
8: Texas Tech (Big 12)
8: Rutgers (Big 10)

9: Florida (SEC)
9: St. Mary’s (WCC)
9: Arizona State (Pac-12)
9: Xavier (Big East)

10: Rhode Island (A-10)
10: Wichita State (AAC)
10: Virginia (ACC)
10: USC (Pac-12)

11: Oklahoma (Big 12)
11: Indiana (Big 10)
11: Cincinnati (AAC)
11: NC State (ACC)
11: Utah State (MWC)
11: Richmond (A-10)

12: East Tennessee State (SoCon)
12: Northern Iowa (MVC)
12: Liberty (Atlantic Sun)
12: Yale (Ivy)

13: Stephen F. Austin (Southland)
13: Vermont (America East)
13: Akron (MAC)
13: North Texas (C-USA)

14: New Mexico State (WAC)
14: Colgate (Patriot)
14: Wright State (Horizon)
14: Hofstra (CAA)

15: UC Irvine (Big West)
15: South Dakota State (Summit)
15: Little Rock (Sun Belt)
15: Winthrop (Big South)

16: Austin Peay (OVC)
16: Montana (Big Sky)
16: St. Francis PA (NEC)
16: Norfolk State (MEAC)
16: Prairie View (SWAC)
16: Siena (MAAC)

Posted in Bracketology | Comments Off on Bracketology 2020: March Madness Predictions (Version 8.0)